Re: silly question about rdf:about

• From: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
• Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2002 13:04:28 -0500
• To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, RDF-Interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <B8D5F45C.30075%me@aaronsw.com>

On 2002-04-06 07:33 AM, "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org> wrote:

> Why is rdf:about treated as magic syntax?  Wouldn't everything work the same
> in the grammar if http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#about were just
> another property?

While you're at it, please replace rdf:Description with rdfs:Resource so
that it uses the same typedNode construction as everything else.

-- 
[ "Aaron Swartz" ; <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> ; <http://www.aaronsw.com/> ]

Received on Sunday, 7 April 2002 14:04:31 UTC