- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 14:35:46 +0100
- To: <reagle@w3.org>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Hi Joseph, I had a quick look through your paper and found some of it convincing, and other bits less so. Briefly: Preponderance Based Trust compelling - and the crucial contribution of the paper IMO. Key Free Trust in the Semantic Web I think this is mistitled. Aren't you really talking about the absense of a Public Key Infrastructure ... AFAICS you still have lots of keys all over the place, it's just that the traditional PKIs are replaced by a preponderance mechanism. Revocation one of the least convincing parts of the paper "However, there are possible solutions" hmmm Another issue is to do with quite what is being signed or digested. Your work on XML C14N has permitted digital signatures and digests of XML documents. You talk about digesting RDF statements, but really we are interested in digesting sets of RDF statements, i.e. graphs. If these graphs have blank (anonymous) nodes then we have difficulties. For an RDF graph currently has no canonical serialization. When considering blank nodes, the RDF graph canonicalisation problem appears to be Graph Isomorphism complete and is hence much harder than the XML canonicalization problem. (See my http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2001/HPL-2001-293.html for discussion about relationship between the graph isomorphism problem and RDF graphs. See my http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2001/HPL-2001-294.html for discussion about serializing an RDF graph). Hope this helps a promising line of enquiry. Jeremy > -----Original Message----- > From: www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org > [mailto:www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Joseph Reagle > Sent: 02 April 2002 19:57 > To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org > Subject: Think Piece: Key Free Trust in the Semantic Web > > > > Comments and suggestions are welcome! > > http://www.w3.org/2002/03/key-free-trust.html > > Key Free Trust in the Semantic Web > > Does Google Show How the Semantic Web > Could Replace Public Key Infrastructure? > > Joseph M. Reagle Jr., <reagle@w3.org> > > Abstract > > This document briefly introduces the topic of trusted semantic web > applications that do not require the existence of an complex public key > infrastructure. It derives from a discussion with Tim > Berners-Lee, but I'm > solely responsible for any errors. Furthermore, it's an early > draft and I'm > probably confused about innumerable things > >
Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2002 08:35:57 UTC