- From: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
- Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 11:49:11 -0700
- To: "'Uche Ogbuji'" <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>, "'Mark Baker'" <distobj@acm.org>
- Cc: <msabin@interx.com>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
I think you're confusing "Location" (RFC 2616 section 14.30) with
"Content-Location".
Note: The Content-Location header field (section 14.14) differs
from Location in that the Content-Location identifies the original
location of the entity enclosed in the request. It is therefore
possible for a response to contain header fields for both Location
and Content-Location. Also see section 13.10 for cache
requirements of some methods.
Neither do service for bridging the difference between me and
my web page, but one could imagine using Content-Location as
a reusable URI for the result of POST (although such use is
not defined).
Larry
--
http://larry.masinter.net
Received on Saturday, 27 April 2002 14:49:51 UTC