RE: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI" from Bill de hÓra on 2002-04-24 (www-rdf-interest@w3.org from April 2002)

From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@eircom.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 00:33:56 +0100
To: "'Nick Matsakis'" <matsakis@mit.edu>, "'Mark Baker'" <distobj@acm.org>
Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000101c1ebe8$815b0310$887ba8c0@mitchum>

 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Nick
> Matsakis  

I am quickly coming to the conclusion that there are only two
options
left:

  1. Don't use http:// URIs in RDF you author/process/trust
  2. Don't trust URIs to refer to distinct entities

It seems that giving up 2 defeats the purpose of RDF.  So, are we
just left with 1?
>>

  3. Use probabilities to guide the inference.

Bill de hÓra

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0.4

iQA/AwUBPMdA4uaWiFwg2CH4EQLYOACfdyMsn3jad1O4p16rd7CKVf4+DoAAn0tC
T0jdRw/4wEIm++gG461F75AA
=YCt2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Wednesday, 24 April 2002 19:40:40 UTC