- From: by way of <a.cuellar@auckland.ac.nz>
- Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 06:52:42 -0400
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
[freed from spam filter -rrs] Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 21:26:27 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3CB63799.3546CEA3@auckland.ac.nz> From: Autumn Cuellar <a.cuellar@auckland.ac.nz> Organization: Bioengineering Research Group, University of Auckland To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org References: <3CB61E54.BCB11DD0@auckland.ac.nz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Right. Just went back to my XML Namespace spec and realized what I really want to know is if there is a way to represent the expanded attribute name (with namespace known) in an rdf:about attribute. Ta. Autumn Cuellar wrote: > > Hi, > > I've been writing an RDF Schema for our xml language, following the > Dublin Core's example in their "Expressing Qualified Dublin Core in > RDF/XML" document > (http://dublincore.org/documents/2001/11/30/dcq-rdf-xml). My problem > concerns, well, namespaces, really. The xml language I'm coding into > RDFS has certain attributes that have the same name as an element. For > instance, if we have a units attribute with the value identifying units > declared somewhere in the document, we'll declare the units with a > <units> element. There should be no problem with this. An element and > an attribute are two separate concepts. Yet, they both occupy the same > space in the namespace, i.e. > http://www.example.org/example_xml_language#units. Surely this problem > has cropped up for others. Suggestions for a way around it? > > Thank you for your help! > > -- > Autumn A. Cuellar > Bioengineering Institute > The University of Auckland > New Zealand -- Autumn A. Cuellar Bioengineering Institute The University of Auckland New Zealand
Received on Friday, 12 April 2002 10:31:07 UTC