W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > April 2002

Re: SUO: Re: REQUEST: survey of available ontologies, taxonomies,thesauri, lexicons?

From: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2002 15:47:57 -0500
Message-ID: <3CA8C77D.6EF41C56@mitre.org>
To: Bill Andersen <andersen@ontologyworks.com>
CC: Frank van Harmelen <Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl>, "John F. Sowa" <sowa@bestweb.net>, SUO <standard-upper-ontology@ieee.org>, Ontoweb <seweb-list@cs.vu.nl>, W3C Web Ontology WG <www-webont-wg@w3.org>, RDF <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, protege-discussion <protege-discussion@smi.stanford.edu>, cg@cs.uah.edu

Why not interpret "higher in the diagram than" as meaning "guides the
use of" rather than as "less basic than" or "following after"?  It seems
to me you're sewing a vest onto an awfully small button.   

Earlier in this thread, you said

> This community had better stop playing academic one-upmanship and get busy
> producing something...

Is further in-depth analysis of TBL's layer-cake diagram SUO's kick-off
to this program? 


Bill Andersen wrote:
> On 4/1/02 13:33, "Frank van Harmelen" <Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl> wrote:
> > I would be happy if this clarification removes "your major complaint about
> > much of the work on the semantic web".
> Frank,
> This is a fine diagram, but notice that "Logic" is a little block on top of
> RDF-schema, for example.  This tells me that things like RDF-schema are seen
> as prior to logic by at least Berners-Lee and perhaps others.
> John's point was precisely the opposite.  He would not disagree with you
> about the choice of establishing the lexicon first, which has been done by
> virtue of the fact that Unicode and URIs are at the bottom.  However, I
> think he would vehemently disagree, as do I, that "Logic" is somehow less
> basic that "RDF-schema" or "XML-schema".

Frank Manola                   The MITRE Corporation
202 Burlington Road, MS A345   Bedford, MA 01730-1420
mailto:fmanola@mitre.org       voice: 781-271-8147   FAX: 781-271-8752
Received on Monday, 1 April 2002 15:49:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:35 UTC