- From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
- Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2002 22:00:28 -0600
- To: "R.V.Guha" <guha@guha.com>
- cc: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> Right now, rdf:about and rdf:id have special status when interpreting > a piece of RDF in XML. If they are to lose that special status and > be treated as any other arc label, then we would need some mechanism > for associating uris with nodes. Otherwise, everything becomes a blank > node. Of course. You are echoing *exactly* what I've been saying to Sandro and Seth, and what I just said in my last message to you, which you quoted. -- Uche Ogbuji Principal Consultant uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com +1 720 320 2046 Fourthought, Inc. http://Fourthought.com 4735 East Walnut St, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA XML strategy, XML tools (http://4Suite.org), knowledge management Track chair, XML/Web Services One (San Jose, Boston): http://www.xmlconference.com/ Latest article: Managing structured Web service metadata - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/ws-wsdlrdf/ Latest article: WSDL and the Wild, Wild West - http://adtmag.com/article.asp?id =6004 Next presentation: XML, The Model Driven Architecture, and RDF @ XML Europe - http://www.xmleurope.com/2002/kttrack.asp#themodel
Received on Monday, 8 April 2002 00:05:50 UTC