RE: Documents, Cars, Hills, and Valleys

> There's a large class of http:-named resource for which the resource
can
> be exhaustively described by a content-typed bag of bytes. But there
are
> other resources (typically those that wrap databases, services etc)
for
> which we can never get a complete rendering of 'the thing itself',
only
> exchange messages with it. The document metaphor(*) seems too passive
a

Let's just acknowledge that "HTTP URL is an endpoint for
message-passing" or more simply, "HTTP URL is just a switchboard", is
widely regarded as abuse of HTTP.  Everyone admits that people abuse
POST this way, but most would agree that we should give people a better
way to do their "RPC and message passing".  Abuse of POST hurts more
than just the semantic web.

Received on Wednesday, 10 April 2002 16:36:33 UTC