Monday, 1 September 1997
Sunday, 31 August 1997
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: Mangled CSS
- Re: [www-html] <none>
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: Logo for user-friendly/browser-friendly/scalable pages
- Re: [www-html] <none>
- Re: [www-html] <none>
- i18n attributes for linked documents
- Re: Logo for user-friendly/browser-friendly/scalable pages
- [www-html] <none>
- [www-html] <none>
- Re: HTML Streaming
- FREE SOFTWARE !!!
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Mangled CSS
Saturday, 30 August 1997
- Re: email forms
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: email forms
Friday, 29 August 1997
Saturday, 30 August 1997
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: Logo for user-friendly/browser-friendly/scalable pages
- Re: HTML Streaming
Friday, 29 August 1997
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: Logo for user-friendly/browser-friendly/scalable pages
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: Award for most unreadable pages: Businessweek!
- Re: Logo for user-friendly/browser-friendly/scalable pages
- Re: Logo for user-friendly/browser-friendly/scalable pages
- Re: A proposal for marking dated sections in HTML
- Re: Logo for user-friendly/browser-friendly/scalable pages
- A proposal for marking dated sections in HTML
- Re: YAWB: trying to follow TFM (long reply)
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: Logo for user-friendly/browser-friendly/scalable pages
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: Award for most unreadable pages: Businessweek!
- Re: Logo for user-friendly/browser-friendly/scalable pages
- Re: Logo for user-friendly/browser-frien
- Re: YAWB: trying to follow TFM (long reply)
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: Logo for user-friendly/browser-friendly/scalable pages
Thursday, 28 August 1997
- Re: Logo for user-friendly/browser-friendly/scalable pages
- HTML 4.0 WD download, server misconfiguration
- Re: Logo for user-friendly/browser-friendly/scalable pages
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: Logo for user-friendly/browser-friendly/scalable pages
- Re: YAWB: trying to follow TFM (long reply)
- Re: Logo for user-friendly/browser-friendly/scalable pages
- Re: Logo for user-friendly/browser-friendly/scalable pages
- HTML Forms Display Error
- Re: Logo for user-friendly/browser-friendly/scalable pages
- Re: Logo for user-friendly/browser-friendly/scalable pages
- Re: Logo for user-friendly/browser-friendly/scalable pages
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: Logo for user-friendly/browser-friendly/scalable pages
- Re: Link colors
- Re: Award for most unreadable pages: Businessweek!
- Re: Award for most unreadable pages: Businessweek!
- Link colors
- Award for most unreadable pages: Businessweek!
- Re: Logo for user-friendly/browser-friendly/scalable pages
- RE: Logo for user-friendly/browser-frien
- RE: PNG support in IE4
- Re: HTML Streaming
Wednesday, 27 August 1997
- RE: PNG support in IE4
- Re: HTML Streaming
- RE: RE: PNG support in IE4
- Logo for user-friendly/browser-friendly/scalable pages
- RE: PNG support in IE4
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: YAWB: trying to follow TFM
- YAWB: trying to follow TFM
- re: New W3C Note: Potential Enhancements to CSS
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Multi columns (was Re: HTML Streaming)
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
Tuesday, 26 August 1997
- Re: What happened to the LH element?
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: Inline elements with %block as content vs. PRE
- Re: keybind and softkeytype [Fwd: Requests to HTML4.0 draft]
- Re: Inline elements with %block as content vs. PRE
- Re: What happened to the LH element?
- Re: keybind and softkeytype [Fwd: Requests to HTML4.0 draft]
- What happened to the LH element?
- Re: keybind and softkeytype [Fwd: Requests to HTML4.0 draft]
- Re: keybind and softkeytype [Fwd: Requests to HTML4.0 draft]
- Re: HTML Streaming
- RE: HTML Streaming
Monday, 25 August 1997
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: Thank you for the discussion on keybind/softkeytype
- Re: Inline elements with %block as content vs. PRE
- Re: keybind and softkeytype [Fwd: Requests to HTML4.0 draft]
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Golf Golf Golf Golf Golf Golf
- Re: Attributes for NOFRAMES and NOSCRIPT
- Re: Attributes for NOFRAMES and NOSCRIPT
- Re: Inline elements with %block as content vs. PRE
- RE: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: Thank you for the discussion on keybind/softkeytype
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: keybind and softkeytype [Fwd: Requests to HTML4.0 draft]
- Thank you for the discussion on keybind/softkeytype
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- HTML Streaming
Sunday, 24 August 1997
- Re: Inline elements with %block as content vs. PRE
- Re: More DTD trick questions: DIR/MENU vs OL/UL, PCDATA vs CDATA
- More DTD trick questions: DIR/MENU vs OL/UL, PCDATA vs CDATA
- Inline elements with %block as content vs. PRE
- Attributes for NOFRAMES and NOSCRIPT
Saturday, 23 August 1997
- New W3C Note: Potential Enhancements to CSS
- New Working Draft of CSS-P
- Re: Disturbing IE 4.0pp2 behavior for lang="en"
- HTML comments--not specific enough
- Re: Entities names?
- Re: Entities names?
Friday, 22 August 1997
- PNG support (was Entities)
- Entities names?
- Re: In addition to INS and DEL elements: UPD(ated)
- Re: Navigation bars (was Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments ...)
- Internationalization Engineer Needed
- Navigation bars (was Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments ...)
- Re: A simple Question
- Re: A simple Question
- Re: keybind and softkeytype [Fwd: Requests to HTML4.0 draft]
- RE: keybind and softkeytype [Fwd: Requests to HTML4.0 draft]
- Re: Disturbing IE 4.0pp2 behavior for lang="en"
- Re: Disturbing IE 4.0pp2 behavior for lang="en"
- Re: Disturbing IE 4.0pp2 behavior for lang="en"
- Re: Disturbing IE 4.0pp2 behavior for lang="en"
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames
- Re: Disturbing IE 4.0pp2 behavior for lang="en"
- Re: Disturbing IE 4.0pp2 behavior for lang="en"
- Re: Disturbing IE 4.0pp2 behavior for lang="en"
- Re: Disturbing IE 4.0pp2 behavior for lang="en"
- Re: Disturbing IE 4.0pp2 behavior for lang="en"
- Re: Disturbing IE 4.0pp2 behavior for lang="en"
- Re: Disturbing IE 4.0pp2 behavior for lang="en"
- Re: Disturbing IE 4.0pp2 behavior for lang="en"
- Re: Disturbing IE 4.0pp2 behavior for lang="en"
- Re: Disturbing IE 4.0pp2 behavior for lang="en"
- Re: Disturbing IE 4.0pp2 behavior for lang="en"
- LANG and character encoding (Re: Disturbing IE 4.0pp2 behavior f
- Disturbing IE 4.0pp2 behavior for lang="en"
- Re: In addition to INS and DEL elements: UPD(ated)
- Re: How closed is the HTML 4.0 Draft?
- Re: keybind and softkeytype [Fwd: Requests to HTML4.0 draft]
- Re: How closed is the HTML 4.0 Draft?
- RE: keybind and softkeytype [Fwd: Requests to HTML4.0 draft]
- Re: In addition to INS and DEL elements: UPD(ated)
Thursday, 21 August 1997
- Re: In addition to INS and DEL elements: UPD(ated)
- HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames
- Re: In addition to INS and DEL elements: UPD(ated)
- How closed is the HTML 4.0 Draft?
- Eleventh International Unicode Conference - FINAL REMINDER
- RE: keybind and softkeytype [Fwd: Requests to HTML4.0 draft]
- Re: keybind and softkeytype [Fwd: Requests to HTML4.0 draft]
- keybind and softkeytype [Fwd: Requests to HTML4.0 draft]
- Re: In addition to INS and DEL elements: UPD(ated)
- In addition to INS and DEL elements: UPD(ated)
- Re: In addition to INS and DEL elements: DATED
Wednesday, 20 August 1997
- Re: Frameset URLs revisited
- Re: A question
- Re: In addition to INS and DEL elements: DATED
- In addition to INS and DEL elements: DATED
- A question
- RE: A single specification
- Frameset URLs revisited
- RE: A single specification
- Re: A single specification
- A single specification
- Re: Location marker
Tuesday, 19 August 1997
- Re: Location marker
- Re: Location marker
- Re: Location marker
- Re: Location marker
- Re: HTML: Dazed and Confused
Monday, 18 August 1997
- Re: A simple Question
- Re: A simple Question
- Re: HTML: Dazed and Confused
- Re: A simple Question
- Re: A simple Question
- Re: FORM element requires ACTION attribute: problems with compatibility
- Re: FORM element requires ACTION attribute: problems with compatibility
- Server-side image maps
- Re: FORM element requires ACTION attribute: problems with compatibility
- ONMOUSEOVER vs. ONMOUSEMOVE
- HTML: Dazed and Confused
- Re: Characters in attribute values
- Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns
- INS/DEL content
- Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns
- Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns
- Re: FORM element requires ACTION attribute: problems with compatibility
- Re: Why <FORM> is a block level element?
- Re: A simple Question
- Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns
- RE: A simple Question
- A simple Question
- Re: FORM element requires ACTION attribute: problems with compatibility
- Re: Portrait vs. Landscape (was Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns)
- Re: FORM element requires ACTION attribute: problems with compatibility
- Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns
- APPLET tag's ALT attribute?
- Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns
- Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns
- Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns
- Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns
Sunday, 17 August 1997
- Re: Portrait vs. Landscape (was Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns)
- Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns
- Re: Portrait vs. Landscape (was Re: THEAD & TFOOT for colum
- Re: Portrait vs. Landscape (was Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns)
- [www-html] <none>
- Re: FORM element requires ACTION attribute: problems with compatibility
- Re: FORM element requires ACTION attribute: problems with compatibility
- Re: Location marker
- Re: Portrait vs. Landscape (was Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns)
- Re: FORM element requires ACTION attribute: problems with compatibility
Saturday, 16 August 1997
- FORM element requires ACTION attribute: problems with compatibility
- Re: Portrait vs. Landscape (was Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns)
- Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns
- Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns
- Re: Why <FORM> is a block level element?
- Re: Why <FORM> is a block level element?
- Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns
- HTML 4.0, Internet Media Types, and the IANA
- Re: Portrait vs. Landscape (was Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns)
- Re: Portrait vs. Landscape (was Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns)
- Re: Portrait vs. Landscape (was Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns)
- Scrolling (Was: THEAD & TFOOT for columns)
- Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns
- Re: Portrait vs. Landscape (was Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns)
Friday, 15 August 1997
- Re: Portrait vs. Landscape (was Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns)
- Re: Portrait vs. Landscape (was Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns)
- Re: Portrait vs. Landscape (was Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns)
- Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns
- Re: Portrait vs. Landscape (was Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns)
- html
- Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns
- Portrait vs. Landscape (was Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns)
- Portrait vs. Landscape (was Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns)
- Re: Why <FORM> is a block level element?
- Re: Characters in attribute values
- Re: Unbloating (was Re: style sheets, dropped capitals and floatimg text)
- Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns
- Re: Why <FORM> is a block level element?
- Re: Why <FORM> is a block level element?
- Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns
- Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns
- Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns
- Re: Location marker
- Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns
Thursday, 14 August 1997
- RE: style sheets, dropped capitals and floatimg text
- Re: Location marker
- Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns
- Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns
- Re: style sheets, dropped capitals and floatimg text
- RE: style sheets, dropped capitals and floatimg text
- Re: Characters in attribute values
- Re: style sheets, dropped capitals and floatimg text
- Re: style sheets, dropped capitals and floatimg text
- Unbloating (was Re: style sheets, dropped capitals and floatimg text)
- Re: style sheets, dropped capitals and floatimg text
- Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns
- Re: style sheets, dropped capitals and floatimg text
- Re: style sheets, dropped capitals and floatimg text
- Re: Why <FORM> is a block level element?
- Re: THEAD & TFOOT for columns
- THEAD & TFOOT for columns
- Re: Why <FORM> is a block level element?
- Re: style sheets, dropped capitals and floatimg text
- style sheets, dropped capitals and floatimg text
- Re: Why <FORM> is a block level element?
- Re: Why <FORM> is a block level element?
- Re: Why <FORM> is a block level element?
- Re: JUSTIFY
- Why <FORM> is a block level element?
- Re: JUSTIFY
- Re: JUSTIFY
Wednesday, 13 August 1997
- Re: JUSTIFY
- Re: Characters in attribute values
- Characters in attribute values
- Re: JUSTIFY
- Re: JUSTIFY
- Unsecured Credit Card-Approval Guaranteed!!!
- Re: JUSTIFY
- Bulk Email For Profit
- Re: JUSTIFY
Tuesday, 12 August 1997
- Re: HTML 4.0 and SGML ... RTFM? (was Re: XMP)
- Type sizes
- Re: JUSTIFY
- Re: JUSTIFY
- Re: HTML 4.0 and SGML (Entities)
- Re: XMP
- Re: JUSTIFY
- Re: XMP
- Re: JUSTIFY
- Re: XMP
- Re: XMP
- Re: XMP
- Re: HTML 4.0 and SGML ... RTFM? (was Re: XMP)
- Re: JUSTIFY
- Re: "em" should be horizontal, "ex" vertical
- Re: XMP
- Re: XMP
- Re: XMP
- Re: XMP
- Re: HTML 4.0 and SGML ... RTFM? (was Re: XMP)
- JUSTIFY
- JUSTIFY
- Re: HTML 4.0 and SGML ... RTFM? (was Re: XMP)
- Re: "em" should be horizontal, "ex" vertical
- Re: HTML 4.0 and SGML ... RTFM? (was Re: XMP)
- HTML 4.0 and SGML ... RTFM? (was Re: XMP)
- Re: XMP
- Re: "em" should be horizontal, "ex" vertical
- Re: "em" should be horizontal, "ex" vertical
- XMP
- Re: "em" should be horizontal, "ex" vertical
- Re: "em" should be horizontal, "ex" vertical
Monday, 11 August 1997
- Re: misuse / abuse of html (was Re: CAPT
- Re: More Microsoft abominations (was RE: Style Sheet Support)
- Re: "em" should be horizontal, "ex" vertical
- Re: "em" should be horizontal, "ex" vertical
- Re: "em" should be horizontal, "ex" vertical
- Re: "em" should be horizontal, "ex" vertical
- Re: why TITLE, not TITLE?
- Re: "em" should be horizontal, "ex" vertical
- Re: misuse / abuse of html (was Re: CAPT
- Re: "em" should be horizontal, "ex" vertical
- Re: "em" should be horizontal, "ex" vertical
- Re: "ACRONYM"?
Sunday, 10 August 1997
- Re: Trademark Entity and Entity Problems in General
- Re: Trademark Entity and Entity Problems in General
- Re: Trademark Entity and Entity Problems in General
- Re: Trademark Entity and Entity Problems in General
Saturday, 9 August 1997
- Re: HTMLRef.hlp?
- Trademark Entity and Entity Problems in General
- Re: More Microsoft abominations
- Re: HTMLRef.hlp?
- Re: Trademarks
- Re: Trademarks (was something about abominations)
- Re: More Microsoft abominations (was RE: Style Sheet Support)
- HTMLRef.hlp?
- More Microsoft abominations (was RE: Style Sheet Support)
- Trademarks (was something about abominations)
- Re: More Microsoft abominations (was RE: Style Sheet Support)
- Re: More Microsoft abominations (was RE: Style Sheet Support)
- More Microsoft abominations (was RE: Style Sheet Support)
Friday, 8 August 1997
Thursday, 7 August 1997
- RE: Style Sheet Support (was:Fw: Images and formatting of lists, keywords in <a>)
- Re: Style Sheet Support (was:Fw: Images and formatting of lists, keywords in <a>)
Wednesday, 7 August 1996
Thursday, 7 August 1997
- Link source/destination confusion
- RE: Style Sheet Support (was:Fw: Images and formatting of lists, keywords in <a>)
Wednesday, 6 August 1997
- Re: Style Sheet Support (was:Fw: Images and formatting of lists, keywords in <a>)
- Re: Fw: Images and formatting of lists, keywords in <a>
- Re: Style Sheet Support (was:Fw: Images and formatting of lists, keywords in <a>)
- Re: Style Sheet Support (was:Fw: Images and formatting of lists, keywords in <a>)
- Re: Fw: Images and formatting of lists, keywords in <a>
- Re: Hanging Indents <DL>
- Fw: Images and formatting of lists, keywords in <a>
- Hanging Indents <DL>
- Re: Whitespace at start of elements
Tuesday, 5 August 1997
- Re: <input type=audio>
- Whitespace at start of elements
- Re: Extending URL syntax for framesets?
- Re: Extending URL syntax for framesets?
- Re: <input type=audio>
- <input type=audio>
Monday, 4 August 1997
- Re: Images and formatting of lists, keywords in <a>
- Eleventh International Unicode Conference - Rates going up!
- Re: What is planned for these attributes?
- AW: Images and formatting of lists, keywords in <a>
Sunday, 3 August 1997
Monday, 4 August 1997
Sunday, 3 August 1997
Saturday, 2 August 1997
- Re: What is planned for these attributes?
- What is planned for these attributes?
- Re: Extending URL syntax for framesets?
- So what is _parent then? (was Re: _parent addressing)
- Missing references/information in HTML 4.0 draft
- Re: No generalized empty element in HTML
- Re: No generalized empty element in HTML
- Re: WebFonts
- Re: WebFonts
- Stuff about the OBJECT tag.
- Re: No generalized empty element in HTML