- From: Jordan Reiter <jreiter@mail.slc.edu>
- Date: Sun, 17 Aug 1997 23:23:52 -0400
- To: Peter Flynn <pflynn@imbolc.ucc.ie>, neil@bigpic.com
- Cc: jft@Psychology.Nottingham.AC.UK, www-html@w3.org
At 3:15 PM -0000 8/15/97, Peter Flynn wrote: >Neil writes: > I think it's a great idea. More importantly however it points out > one fundamental flaw with HTML. Nothing in the language was meant > for horizontal scrolling, you can look all over the place in the > language to find errors if horizontal scrolling is required. > > HTML as far as I can tell was designed for Portrait layout and > >You're barking up the wrong tree. HTML wan't designed to do any kind >of layout. That's a matter for browser and stylesheets. Nothing in >HTML prohibits or encourages either portrait or landscape designs. > >///Peter I don't know. The existence of THEAD and TFOOT with the absence of any kind of left or right defined permanent column seems to suggest a mindset that is vertical in nature. In addition, HTML 4.0's current specs, which include left and right floating for objects, also suggest a vertical leaning (no pun intended). Whether or not HTML's original intent or content is being totally smeared by the emphasis on its use for layout has become somewhat of a theological issue, with discussions leading to a great deal of bloodshed and/or guilt, but very few conversions on either side. The point is that HTML is now being developed, in tandem with Stylesheets, to provide information of a visual nature, and it's important to insure that all forms of layout can somehow be integrated. -------------------------------------------------------- [ Jordan Reiter ] [ mailto:jreiter@mail.slc.edu ] [ "You can't just say, 'I don't want to get involved.' ] [ The universe got you involved." --Hal Lipset, P.I. ] --------------------------------------------------------
Received on Sunday, 17 August 1997 23:24:44 UTC