- From: Marc A. Duncan <maduncan@skipjack.bluecrab.org>
- Date: Sat, 9 Aug 1997 11:04:55 -0400
- To: "Rob" <wlkngowl@unix.asb.com>, "Richard Irving" <ricci@azstarnet.com>
- Cc: <www-html@w3.org>
---------- > From: Rob <wlkngowl@unix.asb.com> > To: Richard Irving <ricci@azstarnet.com> > Cc: www-html@w3.org > Subject: Trademarks (was something about abominations) > Date: Saturday, August 09, 1997 5:51 AM > > > > BTW, since there is a <link rel=Copyright ...> should there also be a > <link rel=Trademark ...?> > Seems like a logical idea to me. Is there any reason there shouldn't? Marc A. Duncan M&A Duncan > > --Rob > > "Richard Irving" <ricci@azstarnet.com> wrote: > > > They're being used for the trademark symbol (tm) -- if they were to use > > ™ (as suggested) the symbol would not show up in a Netscape browser > > (all the way through 4.02). It would simply show the ™ characters. > > I would say this qualifies as a Netscape abomination! > > > > So how would you suggest this problem be worked around, because I'm faced > > with it myself. > >
Received on Saturday, 9 August 1997 11:06:28 UTC