- From: Jan Roland Eriksson <d.tek.jre@ebox.tninet.se>
- Date: Wed, 27 Aug 1997 19:33:43 GMT
- To: www-html@w3.org
- Cc: Albertfine@aol.com
On Tue, 26 Aug 1997 22:11:16 -0400 (EDT), Albertfine@aol.com wrote: > Peter Flynn <pflynn@imbolc.ucc.ie> wrote: > > >I know it's possible, but the rules of HTML forbid this... [snip] > This "sloppy behavior" makes HTML very easy to write. I think this is one of > the reasons why the web is so popular. It also allows experienced HTML > coders to write very lean code. IMO "experienced HTML coders" would like to see to it that their work does validate properly against the DTD selected as a base for their particular work. [snip] > ...the HTML analogous being the organization of tags and the > protocols for HTML editors. I wonder why that particular phrase just passes me??? What is "organization of tags" and "a protocol for an HTML editor"? > >Unfortunately, now that the everyone's using TABLE to align stuff, > >browsers CANNOT display-as-they-go, because they need to receive > >everything in the table before they can work out the widths. [snip] Hmm... have "we" ever had a look at the proposal for HTML 4.0 ? (wich IMHO should be the primary topic of discussion here) > I think all tags should be reviewed and changed to make them streamable. Of > course, this is a very big step. I think the first step should be the > organization of tags and review of the some of more experimental and > proprietary additions to HTML files. Somehow I get the feeling that "we" all need to read up on current _and_ proposed specifications on HTML and HTTP and the WWW and... = * = * = * = * = * = * = * = * = * = * = * = * = Jan Roland Eriksson -- d.tek.jre@ebox.tninet.se URL --- http://home2.swipnet.se/%7Ew-20547/
Received on Wednesday, 27 August 1997 15:35:41 UTC