- From: Liam Quinn <liam@htmlhelp.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Aug 1997 17:55:09 -0400
- To: wahlen@ph-cip.Uni-Koeln.DE (Holger Wahlen), www-html@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- At 10:28 PM 22/08/97 +0200, Holger Wahlen wrote: >David Marsh wrote: > >| I must object to the proposed inclusion of frames, and instead would propose >| a revision to the now obsolete HTML3.0 BANNER element in their place: >| >| * Allow the inclusion of *one* (or at most two) independently scrolling >| _navigation bars_ per page, (to serve a purpose similar to the most >| common frame use) > >How about dusting MENU a bit by permitting it in the document >head (where something like this should be dealt with) for >that purpose? This would break on HTML 2.0 and HTML 3.2 compliant browsers, which would assume that MENU indicates the start of the BODY. Besides, we already have HTML 2.0's LINK element for including navigation bars. Perhaps what would be useful would be some form of CSS extension to suggest whether the LINKs are embedded and what position embedded LINKs would have (top, right, bottom, or left). And of course authors and users should be able to dynamically show and hide embedded LINKs, much like MSIE 4.0b2's Favorites and History panes. This requires no changes to HTML, just some innovation (!) and creativity (!!) from browser vendors. Appropriate extensions to CSS and your favourite client-side scripting language would help, but are not vital. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0 Charset: noconv iQB1AwUBM/4Kuw/JhtXygIx1AQEpogL5AXahr/cqPLyhPeiTln0atuep8Wp6ufZ1 561h1gUpl1oeHZaKNE21g7wwaQF5AntalyEwjKHiP70e0v6fYKbsu7IsKg35c+tb W22dCOJ45+aYZR1i08YgHp/02165lbVz =vEw8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Liam Quinn =============== http://www.htmlhelp.com/%7Eliam/ =============== Web Design Group Enhanced Designs, Web Site Development http://www.htmlhelp.com/ http://enhanced-designs.com/ ====== PGP Key at http://www.htmlhelp.com/%7Eliam/pgp.html =====
Received on Friday, 22 August 1997 17:54:37 UTC