whoops
Comments on datatyping draft
Datatypes Draft Questions & Comments
Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-08-30
Comments on dt proposal
RDF/XML Syntax problems with datatyping literals
In the interest of consensus and progress on datatyping...
- Re: In the interest of consensus and progress on datatyping...
- RE: In the interest of consensus and progress on datatyping...
Proposed agenda item (no global datatyping)
Datatypes direction
namespaces and IRI updates
手錶也可以換現金哦~
High-level comments on datatyping draft
- RE: High-level comments on datatyping draft
- Re: High-level comments on datatyping draft
- Re: High-level comments on datatyping draft
- RE: High-level comments on datatyping draft
- RE: High-level comments on datatyping draft
- RE: High-level comments on datatyping draft
RDF Datatyping Proposal -- Static and Working Revisions
RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2002-08-23
Pls Review: New Media Type Draft
a review of 'RDF Datatyping'
attention editors - ipr disclosure page for rdfcore working group
RE: Alternative representation of typed literal nodes in NTriples (and N3)
- RE: Alternative representation of typed literal nodes in NTriples (and N3)
- RE: Alternative representation of typed literal nodes in NTriples (and N3)
(aside) literals, literal tokens in a graph
RE: Alternative representation of typed literal nodes in NTriples (and N3)
RDF/XML syntax for datatyping, XML Schema validation, and all that jazz...
RE: Alternative representation of typed literal nodes in NTriples (and N3)
RE: Alternative representation of typed literal nodes in NTriples (and N3)
RDF Datatyping Examples -- inline datatype elements
RDF Datatyping Examples -- rdf:type
Alternative representation of typed literal nodes in NTriples (and N3)
- Re: Alternative representation of typed literal nodes in NTriples (and N3)
- RE: Alternative representation of typed literal nodes in NTriples (and N3)
- RE: Alternative representation of typed literal nodes in NTriples (and N3)
- Re: Alternative representation of typed literal nodes in NTriples (and N3)
Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-08-25
- date should be 2002-08-23 [was Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-08-25
- Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-08-25
- "RDF processor"? "understand"??? [was: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-08-25]
Comments on Datatypes almost WD and N-Triples for datatypes (was Re: A Dublin Core with RDF datatypes use case)
regrets for August 23
Minutes of telecon, 2002-08-16
A Dublin Core with RDF datatypes use case
weekly call for agenda items
priority of dark triples
Using XMLSchema-instance attributes in RDF/XML Syntax (fwd)
- Re: Using XMLSchema-instance attributes in RDF/XML Syntax (fwd)
- RE: Using XMLSchema-instance attributes in RDF/XML Syntax (fwd)
- RE: Using XMLSchema-instance attributes in RDF/XML Syntax (fwd)
Draft: Summary of Responses to request for input on datatypes tradeoff
Re: draft-reagle-xenc-mediatype-01.txt
link to last version of Datatyping not-quite-a-working-draft published to the WG
rdf:Alt's relationship to individual statements (fwd)
Minutes of telecon, 2002-08-09
Corrupt Abstract Model doc in archive?
Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-08-16
regrets
can't find minutes for 19/Jul telecon
weekly call for agenda items
datatypes: conversation with Mark Butler, chair of cc/pp
- Re: datatypes: conversation with Mark Butler, chair of cc/pp
- Re: datatypes: conversation with Mark Butler, chair of cc/pp
- RE: datatypes: conversation with Mark Butler, chair of cc/pp
- RE: datatypes: conversation with Mark Butler, chair of cc/pp
- RE: datatypes: conversation with Mark Butler, chair of cc/pp
- RE: datatypes: conversation with Mark Butler, chair of cc/pp
- RE: datatypes: conversation with Mark Butler, chair of cc/pp
datatypes status
regrets for the next telecons
Fwd: 13 Aug Arch Doc available for review
[Fwd: XMLP WG Issue 316 Resolution]
[Fwd: XMLP WG Issue 314 Resolution]
Any use cases for untidy literals except long range datatyping?
- RE: Any use cases for untidy literals except long range datatyping?
- RE: Any use cases for untidy literals except long range datatyping?
- Re: Any use cases for untidy literals except long range datatyping?
Re: Java global implicit typing
The latest proposal ++--
RDF datatyping: retro chic / progress report
Steps to be taken
Justification for new node type
- RE: Justification for new node type
- Re: Justification for new node type
- RE: Justification for new node type
- Re: Justification for new node type
- RE: Justification for new node type
additional context for todays discussions
RE: What the #@&*$(!@ is going on here?! (was RE: N-Triples for proposed xsi:type [was Re: xsi:type test case ]
- RE: What the #@&*$(!@ is going on here?! (was RE: N-Triples for proposed xsi:type [was Re: xsi:type test case ]
- RE: What the #@&*$(!@ is going on here?! (was RE: N-Triples for proposed xsi:type [was Re: xsi:type test case ]
- RE: What the #@&*$(!@ is going on here?! (was RE: N-Triples for proposed xsi:type [was Re: xsi:type test case ]
- RE: What the #@&*$(!@ is going on here?! (was RE: N-Triples for proposed xsi:type [was Re: xsi:type test case ]
- RE: What the #@&*$(!@ is going on here?! (was RE: N-Triples for proposed xsi:type [was Re: xsi:type test case ]
RE: What the #@&*$(!@ is going on here?! (was RE: N-Triples for proposed xsi:type [was Re: xsi:type test case ]
Agenda for RDF Core Teleconference 2002-08-09 (datatypes, # | /)
new datatyping proposal
- RE: new datatyping proposal
- Re: new datatyping proposal
- new datatyping proposal consistent with OMG's MOF
- RE: new datatyping proposal
XML Schema is untidy (was RE: type test case)
- Re: XML Schema is untidy (was RE: type test case)
- RE: XML Schema is untidy (was RE: type test case)
- RE: XML Schema is untidy (was RE: type test case)
- RE: XML Schema is untidy (was RE: type test case)
- RE: XML Schema is untidy (was RE: type test case)
- RE: XML Schema is untidy (was RE: type test case)
- RE: XML Schema is untidy (was RE: type test case)
- RE: XML Schema is untidy (was RE: type test case)
- RE: XML Schema is untidy (was RE: type test case)
- RE: XML Schema is untidy (was RE: type test case)
- RE: XML Schema is untidy (was RE: type test case)
RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model: 2002-08-05
- Re: RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model: 2002-08-05
- RE: RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model: 2002-08-05
weekly call for agenda items
Test cases schema document and test: namespace URI
RE: type test case
Re: What the #@&*$(!@ is going on here?! (was RE: N-Triples for proposed xsi:type [was Re: xsi:type test case ]
What the #@&*$(!@ is going on here?! (was RE: N-Triples for proposed xsi:type [was Re: xsi:type test case ]
- Re: What the #@&*$(!@ is going on here?! (was RE: N-Triples for proposed xsi:type [was Re: xsi:type test case ]
- RE: What the #@&*$(!@ is going on here?! (was RE: N-Triples for proposed xsi:type [was Re: xsi:type test case ]
- Re: What the #@&*$(!@ is going on here?! (was RE: N-Triples for proposed xsi:type [was Re: xsi:type test case ]
regrets for next two weeks
Re: RDF abstract model document - treatment of graphs
Re: what triple bloat? [was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2002-08-02 (rdf doc, datatypes)]
what triple bloat? [was: RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2002-08-02 (rdf doc, datatypes)]
New document: summary of required changes
RDFCore WG minutes for the telecon 2002-08-02 (rdf doc, datatypes)
Regrets for next three weeks
xsi:type test case
New document feedback/review/baises...
comments on http://www.ninebynine.org/wip/RDF-basics/Current/Overview.htm - mistake re media type
LBase: new version available, plus pre-TR work (status/abstract)
Syntax-level typing (was Re: A data typing proposal)
- Re: Syntax-level typing (was Re: A data typing proposal)
- RE: Syntax-level typing (was Re: A data typing proposal)
- RE: Syntax-level typing (was Re: A data typing proposal)
- RE: Syntax-level typing (was Re: A data typing proposal)