- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 19:29:51 +0300
- To: <melnik@db.stanford.edu>
- Cc: <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>, <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>, <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>, <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: ext Sergey Melnik [mailto:melnik@db.stanford.edu] > Sent: 08 August, 2002 18:36 > To: Stickler Patrick (NRC/Tampere) > Cc: Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk; jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com; > Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com; jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com; > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > Subject: Re: XML Schema is untidy (was RE: type test case) > > > Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote: > > > ... > > The WG has *agreed* that any deviations from the stake-in-the-ground > > proposal would be motivated by clear technical and practical > > considerations -- i.e. fatal flaws or errors in the proposal. > > > Can you please provide a URL pointer to the decision you are > referring > to? I don't recall the exact wording of that clause about motivating > factors that you are quoting... This was the agreement of the WG at the Cannes f2f. I'm sure it's in the minutes. It's also been reiterated on the lists a few times. Sorry, no time to dig through the archives just now... Patrick
Received on Friday, 9 August 2002 07:48:36 UTC