Re: What the #@&*$(!@ is going on here?! (was RE: N-Triples for proposed xsi:type [was Re: xsi:type test case ]

On Wed, 7 Aug 2002, pat hayes wrote:

> Well, no; in fact, they can't be self-denoting in this setup. If
> (int)10 is supposed to denote an integer, then if it were
> self-denoting it would have to be an integer, which it isn't. In
> fact, you can't put integers into syntax, so *anything* that denotes
> integers isn't self-denoting.

That should disappoint a lot of travelling salesmen. OK, there may be a
tacit one-step indirection of the same kind that you may want to model
weighted graphs.


-- 
jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 RFC822 jan.grant@bris.ac.uk
They modified their trousers secretly.

Received on Wednesday, 7 August 2002 12:25:36 UTC