Re: Pls Review: New Media Type Draft

On Fri, 23 Aug 2002, Aaron Swartz wrote:

> > ...is rendered very weak by the 'might'. The media type doesn't allow
> > us
> > to infer such intent, so why are we mentioning it?
> >
> > I can't think of any better wording (sorry) so propose we drop that
> > parag.
>
> This is the wording we agreed to on the telecon today, even though it's
> hilariously weak. Should we change the resolution too?

I thought we agreed to it staying re the W3C doc, not re the IETF one... I
still don't like it, but retracted my objection on basis of 'can fix later'. I'd
rather fix it in one place than two...

Dan

Received on Friday, 23 August 2002 19:26:15 UTC