- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 19:44:41 +0100
- To: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
- cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
>>>Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com said: > I've been chewing on the representation of typed literal nodes in > NTriples in a manner that is both consistent for non-XML and XML > literals and which is more compatable with use of qnames rather > than URIrefs, both by N3 as well as in our own examples, since > it is common practice by the editors to use qnames in the NTriples > in the specs. > > What I propose is that we keep the current representation of > literals in NTriples, and that the datatype be separated from > the literal by a comma. Sorry, I doubt that'll fly - , is already used extensively in N3 to separate terms and the lexers may split "a,b" into three tokens. I avoided added or using any more punctuation since there is a lot already used or probably going to be. > non-XML literal "25" > non-XML literal with lang "25"-en > URIref typed non-XML literal <http://...#integer>,"25" > URIref typed non-XML literal with lang <http://...#integer>,"25"-en > qname typed non-XML literal xsd:integer,"25" > qname typed non-XML literal with lang xsd:integer,"25"-en > > XML literal xml"<h1>Foo</h1>" > XML literal with lang xml"<h1>Foo</h1>"-en > URIref typed XML literal <http://...#h1>,xml"<h1>Foo</h1>" > URIref typed XML literal with lang <http://...#h1>,xml"<h1>Foo</h1>"-en > qname typed XML literal xhtml:h1,xml"<h1>Foo</h1>" > qname typed XML literal with lang xhtml:h1,xml"<h1>Foo</h1>"-en It does look better though :) > Since a comma is not a legal XML NAME character, when joining a qname > with an XML literal, there is no ambiguity regarding the partitioning > between the qname and the XML flag 'xml'. > > This keeps both non-XML and XML literals delimited by double quotes, and > no changes to the current NTriples syntax (other than the prefixing of > the datatype). > > It also reinforces, IMO, the fact that the typed literal node is a pairing > of a datatype and a literal, the latter having its own three-part structure > of XML bit, string, and language code. Actually I was half wondering about that. If there was a type URI for XML itself, could we not use <uri-for-xml>"<h1>Foo</h1>" rather than xml"<h1>Foo</h1>" ? > So, we can use qnames in examples and N3 can adopt typed literal nodes > without any syntactic ambiguity. I'll try to get the main N3 developers - Tim and DanC to think about this, but I should note N3 doesn't handle "foo"-en or xml"foo"-en so I'm not sure what to suggest next. However we still don't need qnames in N-Triples - it is syntax sugar, and a simple test format doesn't need it. Dave
Received on Thursday, 22 August 2002 14:45:48 UTC