- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 19:12:34 +0300
- To: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Cc: <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: ext Jos De_Roo [mailto:jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com] > Sent: 09 August, 2002 16:12 > To: Stickler Patrick (NRC/Tampere) > Cc: Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com; w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > Subject: RE: XML Schema is untidy (was RE: type test case) > > > [...] > > > But the tidy versus untidy question is a MT issue that *must* > > be resolved. > > > > If it is not clear which is correct,... > > take the actual MT WD and you find a clear answer > please, show any problem in http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/ As I stated during the concall, and repeat here for the record, the tidyness of literals as defined by the current MT WD is a point of contention in the WG and yet to be determined. Patrick
Received on Friday, 9 August 2002 12:12:37 UTC