- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 11:43:00 +0200
- To: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
If the chair wishes, I would be prepare to propose the following resolution: The WG resolves: + that the RDF Core Specs will include a local datatyping mechanism + that the RDF Core Specs will not include a global datatyping mechanism + to rescind the stake-in-the-ground decision DECISION 2002-02-22/2: DECISION 2002-02-22/3: see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Feb/0656.html If we were to consider this I would suggest three straw poll questions before hand: Qu1: who cannot live with a tidy model theory and no global datatyping? Qu2: who cannot live with an untidy model theory and no global datatyping? Qu3: who cannot live with no global datatyping? My suspicion is that while many in the group have strong opinions about both tidiness and global datatyping that a decision not to do global datatyping reduces the tension and permits us to achieve consensus, at the cost of doing less. I would be surprised if we are down to fewer than one responder to each of those, but we might find that the minorities are small enough to be overruled without breaking consensus. Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 29 August 2002 05:38:13 UTC