W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > August 2002

rdf:Alt's relationship to individual statements (fwd)

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 10:41:33 -0400 (EDT)
To: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0208161037460.9415-100000@tux.w3.org>

RSS and Dublin Core folk are trying to use rdf:Alt and it's painful to
watch :(

Which spec owns the problem of helping these folk? MT? Primer? Schema?


---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 14:54:26 +0100
From: Jon Hanna <jon@spin.ie>
To: RDF-Interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Subject: rdf:Alt's relationship to individual statements
Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 09:52:59 -0400 (EDT)
Resent-From: www-rdf-interest@w3.org

Considering the following example from

<rdf:Description rdf:ID="17">
     <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dublincore.org/"/>
     <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://purl.org/dc/"/>

Does this mean that one can say that the identifier of online:#17 is
http://dublincore.org/, or that its identifier is a collection of
alternative values of which http://dublincore.org/ is the first prefernce?

In other words, given the general definition of
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/identifier as:

<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en-US">An unambiguous reference to the resource
within a given context.</rdfs:comment>

Can we reasonably infer from the above snippet that http://dublincore.org/
serves this purpose with relation to online:#17 ?

Jon Hanna

PGP http://www.spin.ie/jon.asc
PGP Fingerprint 707E 5E39 3BF5 533A D1DD  2083 8169 BFD7 F532 BD18
"...it has been truly said that hackers have even more words for equipment
failures than Yiddish has for obnoxious people." - jargon.txt
Received on Friday, 16 August 2002 10:41:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:14 UTC