RE: The latest proposal ++--

On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Patrick.Stickler wrote:

> > That's an interesting idea. Like I said, in my experience I
> > was able to
> > use multiple schemas and still do "syntactic" long-range
> > typing,

...

> It's like saying that if you want to define rdfs:range
> and rdfs:domain, you have to do so in the same RDF/XML
> instance that the resources are mentioned -- i.e. syntactically.
>
> I don't think so...

Neither do I. My schema definitions were all over the place; they
weren't part of the "instance documents".

-- 
jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 RFC822 jan.grant@bris.ac.uk
Goth isn't dead, it's just lying very still and sucking its cheeks in.

Received on Monday, 12 August 2002 05:59:58 UTC