- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 14 Aug 2002 12:58:25 -0500
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, mark_butler@otter.hpl.hp.com
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 12:48, Brian McBride wrote: > > I chatted with Mark Butler yesterday, including some discussion of > datatypes in cc/pp. > > One of the ideas that Mark favours is to define an XML Schema for the cc/pp > language. This would enable: > > o validation of incoming cc/pp profiles to a server > o the use of default attributes to insert datatype attributes such as > xsi:type="xsd:decimal" automatically, thus providing global implicit > datatyping in the parser. Ouch! that would conflict with a requirement I hold near and dear, that literals be syntacitcally evident. i.e. that you can take an RDF/XML document and tell whether it's true or false in an interpreation without appeal to a schema or whatever. Recall: a test case for "literals must be self-evident" From: Dan Connolly (connolly@w3.org) Date: Thu, Nov 29 2001 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Nov/0644.html > Whilst not perfect, does this technique go some way towards meeting the > need for global implicit datatyping. It's all well and good to use XML Schemas to check RDF/XML documents, but to use them to supply default attributes isn't workable. > > Brian -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 14 August 2002 13:58:39 UTC