- From: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:15:21 -0500
- To: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Cc: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Wednesday, August 28, 2002, at 08:34 AM, Graham Klyne wrote: > With reference to DanBri's comment about assertion: I think the > intent is already conveyed by section 2, so the 2nd para of section 4 > can be dropped without loss of meaning. The paragraphs explains how the media type can be used for assertion, section 2 explains how it can be used in processing practice. I don't see how the intent is conveyed. > However, when a URI with fragment identifier is used within an RDF > document, > the URI part is presumed to refer to an RDF document I disagree. This assumption is not true for a large portion of existing RDF documents (especially RSS files). > I think this paragraph would usefully go at the top of this section. Fixed. -- Aaron Swartz [http://www.aaronsw.com] I am large, I contain multitudes.
Received on Wednesday, 28 August 2002 11:15:23 UTC