W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > August 2002

Re: Pls Review: New Media Type Draft

From: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:15:21 -0500
Cc: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
To: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
Message-Id: <F8226A1D-BA98-11D6-A5A7-003065F376B6@aaronsw.com>

On Wednesday, August 28, 2002, at 08:34  AM, Graham Klyne wrote:
> With reference to DanBri's comment about assertion:  I think the 
> intent is already conveyed by section 2, so the 2nd para of section 4 
> can be dropped without loss of meaning.

The paragraphs explains how the media type can be used for assertion, 
section 2 explains how it can be used in processing practice. I don't 
see how the intent is conveyed.

> However, when a URI with fragment identifier is used within an RDF 
> document,
> the URI part is presumed to refer to an RDF document

I disagree. This assumption is not true for a large portion of existing 
RDF documents (especially RSS files).

> I think this paragraph would usefully go at the top of this section.

Aaron Swartz [http://www.aaronsw.com] I am large, I contain multitudes.
Received on Wednesday, 28 August 2002 11:15:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:14 UTC