- From: Sergey Melnik <melnik@db.stanford.edu>
- Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 12:18:34 +0200
- To: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
I'd like to restate the questions, which Jan raised recently, more explicitly. Much of the ongoing discussion about tidy/untidy literals amounts to arguing about different readings of a given piece of RDF/XML or NTriples syntax. From what I can tell, both tidy and untidy literals are implementable, so we have to pick one and wrap up. To my knowledge, untidy literals have been first suggested in the context of long range datatyping (aka implicit/global idiom). Specifically, untidy literals provide a shortcut for using a bNode with a property (two triples are essentially merged into one). Is this shortcut so fundamental that there is value of making it part of the spec? Is there an appealing use case for untidy literals that is not long range datatyping (aka implicit/global idiom)? Are we closing off any important extensibility paths if we go for tidy literals? Sergey
Received on Monday, 12 August 2002 06:18:43 UTC