- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 16:18:19 +0100
- To: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>, me@aaronsw.com, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Thanks for the heads up Martin. Brian At 11:19 20/08/2002 +0900, Martin Duerst wrote: >Hello Aaron, dear RDF Core WG, > >On ietf-types@iana.org and some related list, we were just looking >at http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlenc-core/#sec-MediaType which containes >some instances of text like this: > > Same as ... of application/xml as specified in RFC 3023[XML-MT] > or the most recent specification that supercedes it. > >There seemed to be general agreement that a moving target is >not a good idea. > >Josef Reagle told us that he got that text from: >http://www.aaronsw.com/2002/rdf-mediatype.html > >I wanted to tell you that you may want to fix this. > >Regards, Martin. > > > >At 14:47 02/08/19 -0400, Joseph Reagle wrote: >>On Thursday 08 August 2002 06:07 pm, Larry Masinter wrote: >> > # Optional parameters: charset >> > # Same as charset parameter of application/xml as >> > # specified in RFC 3023 [XML-MT] or the most recent >> > # specification that supersedes it. >> > >> > I admit I was a little confused on this one, and misread >> > what it said. However, I don't understand >> > "or the most recent specification that supersedes it", >> > though, since a specification may supercede RFC 3023 >> > but not be appropriate for a reference to a particular >> > section. >> >>I'm happy to eliminate that text as I oppose those sort of references in >>general. In this case, I was merely following what I could see the rdf >>folks doing for a similar type of registration: >> http://www.aaronsw.com/2002/rdf-mediatype.html
Received on Tuesday, 20 August 2002 11:21:04 UTC