date should be 2002-08-23 [was Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-08-25

Oops - of course that should be 2002-08-23.

Brian

At 16:41 22/08/2002 +0100, bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com wrote:

>Time:
>10:00:00 Fri Aug 25 2002 in America/New York
>
>which is equivalent to
>15:00:00 Fri Aug 25 2002 in Europe/London
>
>Phone: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)#7332
>irc: irc.w3.org #rdfcore
>
>1: Scribes
>This weeks volunteer scribe is Eric Miller
>Volunteer to scribe next week
>
>
>2: Roll Call
>
>
>3: Review Agenda
>
>
>4: Next telecon 30th Aug 2002
>
>
>5: Minutes of 2002-08-09 telecon
>
>See:
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0152.html
>
>
>6: Status of minutes of 2002-08-16 telecon
>
>See:
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0171.html
>
>
>7: Confirm Status of Completed Actions
>
>ACTION: 2002-06-18#3 daveB
>Fold Jeremy's text describing the graph syntax into the syntax document
>
>see:
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0067.html
>
>ACTION: 2002-07-19#1 eric
>investigate why JanGgets dropped on rdf-comments (twice now)
>
>ACTION: 2002-08-16#2 bwm
>to ask Semantic Web Coordination group to clarify priority of dark triples
>
>see:
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0168.html
>
>ACTION: 2002-08-16#4 PatrickS
>Circulate URI of latest datatypes document
>
>see:
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0158.html
>
>ACTION: 2002-08-16#6 bwm
>Summarise responses to datatypes question to community
>
>see:
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0163.html
>
>
>
>8: Confirm Status of Withdrawn Actions
>
>ACTION: 2002-06-17#8 guha
>define the dark/light function for URIREFs
>
>ACTION: 2002-06-17#9  patH
>update the model theory to make statements with dark properties have no 
>semantics
>
>ACTION: 2002-06-17#10 guha
>consider impact of dark triples on test cases
>
>ACTION: 2002-06-17#12 patH
>propose a paragraph on dark triples for the primer
>
>ACTION: 2002-06-17#13  daveB
>ensure that the description of the graph syntax adequately describes darkness
>
>
>
>9: Status of new Concepts and Abstract Data Model WD
>2002-08-16#3  EricM  publish rdf concepts and abstract data model WD
>
>
>See:
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0067.html
>
>
>10: Relationship between XML Schema and RDF
>Specifically, suggestion to ignore attributes from the xml:schema
>namespace to allow processing by both xml schema processors and rdf
>processors.
>
>
>See:
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0165.html
>
>
>11: rdf:Alt's relationship to individual statements
>They should be using repeated properties, not Alt, right?
>Each spec in its own way should help answer this problem.
>
>
>See:
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0157.html
>
>
>12: rdfms:assertion
>I could find no record of us formally closing this issue.  Therefore:
>
>Propose the text in section 2.3.2 of the Concepts and Abstract Data Model 
>document resolves this issue and it be closed.
>
>
>See:
> 
>http://www.ninebynine.org/wip/RDF-basics/2002-08-05/Overview.htm#section-Social
>
>
>13: Meaning of rdf:type and relationship between RDF and RDFS
>(a) must any RDF processor understand the object of an rdf:type property 
>as being an rdfs:Class (and hence understand what an rdfs:Class is)?
>
>(b) must an RDF processor that understands what an rdfs:Class is also
>understand the rest of the RDFS vocabulary?
>
>
>See:
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0173.html
>
>
>14: Datatypes
>Summary of after hours discussion last week
>Progress on datatypes WD
>Uses cases - DC, CC/PP, others?
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------
>This agenda was produced by Jema, the Jena WG assistant

Received on Thursday, 22 August 2002 13:08:28 UTC