Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-08-30

Time:
10:00:00 Fri Aug 30 2002 in America/New York

which is equivalent to
15:00:00 Fri Aug 30 2002 in Europe/London

Phone: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)#7332
irc: irc.w3.org #rdfcore

1: Scribes
This weeks volunteer scribe is Jan Grant
Volunteer to scribe next week


2: Roll Call


3: Review Agenda


4: Next telecon 6th Sept 2002


5: Minutes of 2002-08-23 telecon with correction

See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0224.html


6: Confirm Status of Completed Actions

ACTION: 2002-08-23#5 PatrickS
send copy of version-for-review of datatypes to www-archive and post URI to the RDFcore mailing list.

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0233.html

ACTION: 2002-08-23#7 FrankM
Propose alternative text for the concepts and abstract model document to rectify concerns with conflicting use of "assertion". 

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0226.html

ACTION: 2002-08-23#8 AaronSw
Update MIME type draft for WG review prior to re-issue.

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0221.html



7: Status of new Concepts and Abstract Data Model WD
2002-08-16#3  EricM  publish rdf concepts and abstract data model WD


See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0067.html


8: Status of new mime types draft
2002-08-23#8  AaronSw  Update MIME type draft for WG review prior to re-issue.
Has everyone's comments been accounted for?

Propose approve publication of this draft


See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0221.html


9: Datatypes
2002-08-23#3  JanG  review current datatypes document.
2002-08-23#4  SteveP  review current datatypes document.
2002-08-23#5  PatrickS  send copy of version-for-review of datatypes to 
              www-archive and post URI to the RDFcore mailing list.

Focus on part 1 of Patrick's new consensus building document 

  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0257.html

which is intended to capture those aspects of datatyping we agree on,
noting DaveB's issue with the syntax:

  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0260.html



See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0233.html
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0257.html
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0260.html


10: rdf:Alt's relationship to individual statements
2002-08-23#1  DanC  review primer text and propose alternative that clarifies
               status of Alt
2002-08-23#2  DaveB  initiate dialog with DC community about the issue of
                rdf:Alt usage.


See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0157.html


11: Relationship between XML Schema and RDF
Specifically, suggestion to ignore attributes from the xml:schema
namespace to allow processing by both xml schema processors and rdf
processors.
             

See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0165.html


12: Meaning of rdf:type and relationship between RDF and RDFS

Has this been resolved by discussion of removing term "rdf processor"?

(a) must any RDF processor understand the object of an rdf:type property as being an rdfs:Class (and hence understand what an rdfs:Class is)?

(b) must an RDF processor that understands what an rdfs:Class is also
understand the rest of the RDFS vocabulary?
  

See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0173.html


13: Frank's new assertion text
2002-08-23#7  FrankM  Propose alternative text for the concepts and abstract
                 model document to rectify concerns with conflicting use of 
                 "assertion".


See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Aug/0226.html
  http://www.ninebynine.org/wip/RDF-basics/2002-08-05/Overview.htm#section-Social



------------------------------------------------------------
This agenda was produced by Jema, the Jena WG assistant

Received on Friday, 30 August 2002 09:04:25 UTC