- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 13:34:12 +0300
- To: <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: ext Jan Grant [mailto:Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk] > Sent: 23 August, 2002 13:28 > To: Stickler Patrick (NRC/Tampere) > Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg > Subject: Re: Alternative representation of typed literal nodes in > NTriples (and N3) > > > On Thu, 22 Aug 2002 Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote: > > > It also reinforces, IMO, the fact that the typed literal > node is a pairing > > of a datatype and a literal, the latter having its own > three-part structure > > of XML bit, string, and language code. > > I'm not convinced that this is a "fact". Well, fair enough. One could also consider literals to be quads, made up of datatype, lexical form, XML bit, and lang. I'm OK with either. Patrick > -- > jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ > Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 RFC822 > jan.grant@bris.ac.uk > Axioms speak louder than words. > >
Received on Friday, 23 August 2002 06:34:15 UTC