Friday, 29 March 2002
Thursday, 28 March 2002
- Re: The root CA for the XMLDSig Interop tests
- Fwd: Announcement: DOM Level 3 XPath in Last Call
- for my ref
- Re: The root CA for the XMLDSig Interop tests
Tuesday, 26 March 2002
- Re: Interoperability Report on Exclusive XML Canonicalization
- Re: Update interop report on XML-Signature Core Syntax and Processing
- Re: Error in XML-Signature interop report page
- Re: Unaccessible page in Merlin's XMLDSig interop tests
- Re: Unaccessible page in Merlin's XMLDSig interop tests
- Re: Unaccessible page in Merlin's XMLDSig interop tests
- RE: Unaccessible page in Merlin's XMLDSig interop tests
- Error in XML-Signature interop report page
- Update interop report on XML-Signature Core Syntax and Processing
- Additional test cases for Exclusive XML Canonicalization
- Interoperability Report on Exclusive XML Canonicalization
- Unaccessible page in Merlin's XMLDSig interop tests
- broken URL in the
Monday, 25 March 2002
Saturday, 23 March 2002
Friday, 22 March 2002
Thursday, 21 March 2002
- RE: Need Union and RE: Should I organize a call on the XPath Filter?
- Re: Need Union and RE: Should I organize a call on the XPath Filter?
- Re: Test Vectors for DName encoding
- RE: Test Vectors for DName encoding
- Re: Test Vectors for DName encoding
- Test Vectors for DName encoding
Wednesday, 20 March 2002
- Fwd: New Erratum E04 (Was: NFC)
- Need Union and RE: Should I organize a call on the XPath Filter?
- Re: Should I organize a call on the XPath Filter?
- Re: Should I organize a call on the XPath Filter?
- Re: Alternative XPathFilter - a picture says more...
- Re: Alternative XPathFilter - a picture says more...
- RE: Should I organize a call on the XPath Filter?
- Re: Alternative XPathFilter - a picture says more...
Tuesday, 19 March 2002
- Re: Alternative XPathFilter - a picture says more...
- Alternative XPathFilter - a picture says more...
- Should I organize a call on the XPath Filter?
- RE: New XPath Filter Transform
- Re: Minor Typos in XML-Signature XPath Filter 2.0, Revision 1.4
- Alternative XPath Filter
- Minor Typos in XML-Signature XPath Filter 2.0, Revision 1.4
Monday, 18 March 2002
- Re: XMLDSIG erratum
- Re: XMLDSIG erratum
- Re: Infomosaic SecureXML Interoperability test results
- Re: Exclusive C14n Interoperability Report
- RE: New XPath Filter Transform
- RE: New XPath Filter Transform
Sunday, 17 March 2002
Saturday, 16 March 2002
Friday, 15 March 2002
- RE: New XPath Filter Transform
- RE: New XPath Filter Transform
- Re: New XPath Filter Transform
- Re: Exclusive C14n Interoperability Report
- Exclusive C14n Interoperability Report
Thursday, 14 March 2002
- RE: New XPath Filter Transform
- Re: New XPath Filter Transform
- Re: Schema Centric Canonicalization algorithm
- RE: New XPath Filter Transform
- RFC 3275 on XML-Signature Syntax and Processing
Wednesday, 13 March 2002
- Esoteric C14N and Security Cautions
- RE: Schema Centric Canonicalization algorithm
- Re: Schema Centric Canonicalization algorithm
- Re: New XPath Filter Transform
- RE: Schema Centric Canonicalization algorithm
Tuesday, 12 March 2002
Monday, 11 March 2002
Saturday, 9 March 2002
Friday, 8 March 2002
- Re: New XPath Filter Transform
- Re: New XPath Filter Transform
- RE: New XPath Filter Transform
- Re: New XPath Filter Transform
- Re: ordering of multiple X509Certificates
- Re: XPath errors in specifications
- Re: ordering of multiple X509Certificates
- ordering of multiple X509Certificates
Thursday, 7 March 2002
- Re: New XPath Filter Transform
- RE: Schema Centric Canonicalization algorithm
- RE: XPath errors in specifications
- Re: New XPath Filter Transform
- XPath errors in specifications
Wednesday, 6 March 2002
- Re: Inclusive and exclusive XML Canonicalization in libxml2
- RE: XML Signature SDK Testing
- Re: RDF C14N Inclusive or Exclusive
- RE: RDF C14N Inclusive or Exclusive
- Re: RDF C14N Inclusive or Exclusive
- Re: Salt and Iteration for HMAC (http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#hmac-sha1)
Tuesday, 5 March 2002
- Re: Schema Centric Canonicalization algorithm
- Re: Salt and Iteration for HMAC (http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#hmac-sha1)
- Salt and Iteration for HMAC (http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#hmac-sha1)
- Re: Are there DName encoding samples?
- Re: Are there DName encoding samples?
- RE: RDF C14N Inclusive or Exclusive
- Are there DName encoding samples?
Monday, 4 March 2002
- Inclusive and exclusive XML Canonicalization in libxml2
- Re: questions about exc-c14n
- Re: RDF C14N Max or Min
- Re: RDF C14N Inclusive or Exclusive
- RDF C14N Max or Min
- Re: XML Signature SDK Testing
- RE: RDF C14N Inclusive or Exclusive
- RDF C14N XML Literal Equality
- Re: RDF C14N Inclusive or Exclusive
- RDF C14N InclusiveNamespaces
- RE: RDF C14N Inclusive or Exclusive
- RDF C14N Inclusive or Exclusive
- RE: RDF C14N Comments
- Re: RDF C14N Comments
- RDF XML Canonicalization Intro
- RDF C14N Comments
- RDF & XML Literals: Intro
- RDF & enveloping of XML structures
Sunday, 3 March 2002
Friday, 1 March 2002
- Re: Schema Centric Canonicalization algorithm
- RE: XML Signature SDK Testing
- Re: XML Signature SDK Testing
- XML Signature SDK Testing
Friday, 22 February 2002
- Re: Newbie Question????
- Re: Please Update Interop Matrix for GapXse
- Newbie Question????
- Please Update Interop Matrix for GapXse
- Re: other signature algorithm
Wednesday, 20 February 2002
Tuesday, 19 February 2002
Sunday, 17 February 2002
Saturday, 16 February 2002
Friday, 15 February 2002
- Re: Question for implementors: XPath model and CDATA sections
- RE: Question for implementors: XPath model and CDATA sections
- Re: Question for implementors: XPath model and CDATA sections
- RE: Question for implementors: XPath model and CDATA sections
Thursday, 14 February 2002
Tuesday, 12 February 2002
- Re: Question for implementors: XPath model and CDATA sections
- Re: Question for implementors: XPath model and CDATA sections
- Re: Question for implementors: XPath model and CDATA sections
- Re: Question for implementors: XPath model and CDATA sections
- Announcement: Apache XML Security v1.0.0
- RE: Question for implementors: XPath model and CDATA sections
- Re: Question for implementors: XPath model and CDATA sections
- RE: Question for implementors: XPath model and CDATA sections
- Question for implementors: XPath model and CDATA sections
Monday, 11 February 2002
Friday, 8 February 2002
- Re: Beta exc-c14n report
- Re: Beta exc-c14n report
- Final Tweaks to Exclusive XML Canonicalization CR
- Re: Enveloped Signature Transform
- Re: enveloping signature
Thursday, 7 February 2002
- New XPath Filter Transform
- enveloping signature
- Re: Enveloped Signature Transform
- Re: Enveloped Signature Transform
- Re: Enveloped Signature Transform
Wednesday, 6 February 2002
Tuesday, 5 February 2002
- Protocol Action: XML-Signature Syntax and Processing to Draft Standard
- String Serial Number Representation
Monday, 4 February 2002
Sunday, 3 February 2002
Saturday, 2 February 2002
Friday, 1 February 2002
- Beta exc-c14n report
- Re: Some exc-c14n tests
- Re: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees
- Re: Enveloped Signature Transform
- Re: Enveloped Signature Transform
- Enveloped Signature Transform
Thursday, 31 January 2002
- RE: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees
- Re: Some exc-c14n tests
- Call for Testimonials, XML Signature
- Some exc-c14n tests
- Re: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees
- Re: Test vectors for draft-eastlake-xmldsig-uri-02.txt
Wednesday, 30 January 2002
Tuesday, 29 January 2002
- Re: Bad news! RE: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees
- RE: Bad news! RE: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees
- RE: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees
- Re: Encoding of Strings in DNames (X509IssuerSerial, X509SubjectName)
- Re: Encoding of Strings in DNames (X509IssuerSerial, X509SubjectName)
Monday, 28 January 2002
- Re: Bad news! RE: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees
- Bad news! RE: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees
- Re: Encoding of Strings in DNames (X509IssuerSerial, X509SubjectName)
- Re: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees
- RE: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees
- Re: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees
- RE: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees
Saturday, 26 January 2002
- Re: Normative vs. non-normative references
- Re: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees
Friday, 25 January 2002
- RE: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees
- Re: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees
- RE: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees
- Re: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees
- RE: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees
Thursday, 24 January 2002
- Re: Normative vs. non-normative references
- Re: Normative vs. non-normative references
- Re: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees
- RE: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees
- Normative vs. non-normative references
- Re: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees
- RE: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees
- Re: X509SubjectName and binary values
Wednesday, 23 January 2002
- Re: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees
- RE: History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees
- History: Question on C14N list of nodes instead of subtrees
- Requesting advance of xml-exc to Candidate REC
- RE: X509SubjectName and binary values
- Re: X509SubjectName and binary values
Tuesday, 22 January 2002
- RE: Encoding of Strings in DNames (X509IssuerSerial, X509SubjectName)
- Re: How do I represent a Certificate Chain
Monday, 21 January 2002
Sunday, 20 January 2002
Friday, 18 January 2002
- Re: Encoding of Strings in DNames (X509IssuerSerial, X509SubjectName)
- RE: Encoding of Strings in DNames (X509IssuerSerial, X509SubjectName)
- RE: Encoding of Strings in DNames (X509IssuerSerial, X509SubjectName)
- RE: ECDSA as signature algorithm
Thursday, 17 January 2002
- Re: DOM WG last call comments on Exclusive XML Canonicalization
- RE: ECDSA as signature algorithm
- Re: PrefixList: whitespace or commas (Was: Notes on xml-exc-c14n rev 1.21)
Wednesday, 16 January 2002
- Re: Encoding of Strings in DNames (X509IssuerSerial, X509SubjectName)
- Re: Encoding of Strings in DNames (X509IssuerSerial, X509SubjectName)
- RE: ECDSA as signature algorithm
- Re: ECDSA as signature algorithm
- RE: ECDSA as signature algorithm
- ECDSA as signature algorithm
- Encoding of Strings in DNames (X509IssuerSerial, X509SubjectName)
- Revised Additional URIs Internet-Drafts
- Re: Whitespace
Tuesday, 15 January 2002
Monday, 14 January 2002
- Re: PrefixList: whitespace or commas (Was: Notes on xml-exc-c14n rev 1.21)
- Re: minor post-last call exclusive c14n comment
- Re: PrefixList: whitespace or commas (Was: Notes on xml-exc-c14n rev 1.21)
- minor post-last call exclusive c14n comment
Sunday, 13 January 2002
Monday, 14 January 2002
Saturday, 12 January 2002
Friday, 11 January 2002
- Re: PrefixList: whitespace or commas (Was: Notes on xml-exc-c14n rev 1.21)
- Re: xml:space
- Re: Whitespace
Thursday, 10 January 2002
- Re: XML Protocol comments on Exclusive Canonicalization
- Re: Notes on xml-exc-c14n rev 1.21
- PrefixList: whitespace or commas (Was: Notes on xml-exc-c14n rev 1.21)
- RE: Notes on xml-exc-c14n rev 1.21
- Encryption and Unicode (was: Re: WOOPS: xmlenc Call 13:00 EST 20020107)
Wednesday, 9 January 2002
- Encryption code-set issues (Was Re: WOOPS: xmlenc Call 13:00 EST 20020107)
- Re: Notes on xml-exc-c14n rev 1.21
- Re: Notes on xml-exc-c14n rev 1.21
- Re: Verification Response Proposal: Toolkits ought to return bytes of verified data to the application
- Re: Verification Response Proposal: Toolkits ought to return bytes of verified data to the application
- Re: Verification Response Proposal: Toolkits ought to return bytes of verified data to the application
- Re: Verification Response Proposal: Toolkits ought to return bytes of verified data to the application
- Re: Verification Response Proposal: Toolkits ought to return bytes of verified data to the application
- Re: WOOPS: xmlenc Call 13:00 EST 20020107
- Notes on xml-exc-c14n rev 1.21
- Re: Verification Response Proposal: Toolkits ought to return bytes of verified data to the application
- Re: Whitespace
- Verification Response Proposal: Toolkits ought to return bytes of verified data to the application
Tuesday, 8 January 2002
Monday, 7 January 2002
- Re: About whitespace in ds:SignedInfo
- Re: DOM WG last call comments on Exclusive XML Canonicalization
- Re: About whitespace in ds:SignedInfo