- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 17:08:28 -0500
- To: TAMURA Kent <kent@trl.ibm.co.jp>, w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
- Cc: Aleksey Sanin <aleksey@aleksey.com>
I've updated [1] with Kent's and Aleksey's information. [1] http://www.w3.org/Signature/2002/02/01-exc-c14n-interop.html On Friday 15 March 2002 01:01, TAMURA Kent wrote: > Performance: > C14n: 53037 [ms] > Exclusive C14n: 72584 [ms] > Xerces2 serializer: 13219 [ms] > These are time for serializing a DOM tree representing a small > document 10000 times. Note that we have not done any > optimization yet. Ok, please let me know if optimization increases the performance. My goal is that the performance should be no worse than c14n in general, and with optimization in some scenarios, faster. So I hope the 27% decrease can be mitigated in the general case. -- Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature/ W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Monday, 18 March 2002 17:08:35 UTC