- From: Gregor Karlinger <gregor.karlinger@iaik.at>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 14:04:28 +0100
- To: "Martin Duerst" <duerst@w3.org>, "Gregor Karlinger" <gregor.karlinger@iaik.at>, "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@w3.org>
- Cc: "XMLSigWG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <LBEPJAONIMDADHFHAEAOAELKCMAA.gregor.karlinger@iaik.at>
Martin,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Duerst [mailto:duerst@w3.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 2:50 PM
[...]
> I guess I would be the first to jump at anybody who confused
> bytes and characters in a dangerous way. But here, one or
> the other will lead to the same result, because we are only
> looking at both characters as well as bytes with values below
> 128, and in this case, it doesn't make any difference at all,
> due to the properties of UTF-8.
I do not think that your statement is true. Consider the following use
case:
* A signature application wants to add a X509SubjectName child to
the KeyInfo element, containing a DN with a single RDN with a
single AVA, for which the attribute type is "CN" and the value
should be "Heinrich Muller", whereas "Heinrich Muller" is a unicode
string, and the application does not bother how this unicode string
is encoded in XMLDSIG or in a X509Certificate.
* According to the current XMLDSIG draft, the resulting X509SubjectName
element is:
<X509SubjectName>CN=Heinrich Muller</X509SubjectName>
The text of this element of course does not conform with RFC 2253, since
this text still consists of XML (~ unicode) characters, and RFC 2253
operates on UTF8-Strings.
Regards, Gregor
>
> Regards, Martin.
>
>
> >Joseph,
> >
> >currently applications conforming with XMLDSIG must encode DNames in
> >the way described in section 4.4.4 of the current draft [1]:
> >
> ><specsnip>
> > * Consider the string as consisting of Unicode characters.
> >
> > * Escape occurrences of the following special characters by
> > prefixing it with the "\" character:
> >
> > - a "#" character occurring at the beginning of the string
> > - one of the characters ",", "+", """, "\", "<", ">" or ";"
> >
> > * Escape all occurrences of ASCII control characters (Unicode range
> > \x00 - \x 1f) by replacing them with "\" followed by a two digit
> > hex number showing its Unicode number.
> >
> > * Escape any trailing white space by replacing "\ " with "\20".
> >
> > * Since a XML document logically consists of characters, not octets,
> > the resulting Unicode string is finally encoded according to the
> > character encoding used for producing the physical representation
> > of the XML document.
> ></specsnip>
> >
> >I think that there are two problems with these instructions:
> >
> >(1) We claim that these instructions are conforming with RFC
> 2253 [2]. This
> > is currently not true, since RFC 2253 demands the escaping of the
> > whitespace character (ASCII code \x20) at the beginning and at the
> > end of the string (see section 2.4).
> >
> >(2) (a fundamental problem): The instructions in section 2.4 of
> [2] operate
> > on a UTF8-String, i. e. in the octet domain. Our
> instructions operate
> > on a Unicode string, i. e. in the character domain.
> Therefore I consider
> > it useless to try to conform to RFC 2253 with the current
> instructions.
> >
> >To solve the problems, I suggest:
> >
> >- Do not state that the encoding of DNames conforms with RFC 2253, rather
> > state that our instructions are similar to that of RFC 2253
> (only similar
> > because of the domain difference).
> >
> >- Modify the instructions as follows:
> >
> > * Consider the string as consisting of Unicode characters.
> >
> > * Escape occurrences of the following special characters by
> > prefixing it with the "\" character:
> >
> > - a "#" occurring at the beginning of the string
> > - one of the characters ",", "+", """, "\", "<", ">" or ";"
> >
> > * Escape control characters that are not XML characters (\x00-\x08,
> > \x0B-\x0C, \x0E-\x19).
> >
> > This is sufficient in order to produce text that consists of valid
> > XML characters, and to be able to reparse the DName string.
> >
> >Liebe Gruesse/Regards,
> >---------------------------------------------------------------
> >DI Gregor Karlinger
> >mailto:gregor.karlinger@iaik.at
> >http://www.iaik.at
> >Phone +43 316 873 5541
> >Institute for Applied Information Processing and Communications
> >Austria
> >---------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >---
> >[1]
> >http://www.w3.org/Signature/Drafts/xmldsig-core/Overview.html#sec
-X509Data
>[2] http://ietf.org/rfc/rfc2253.txt
Received on Friday, 18 January 2002 08:05:46 UTC