- From: merlin <merlin@baltimore.ie>
- Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 18:26:43 +0000
- To: reagle@w3.org
- Cc: TAMURA Kent <kent@trl.ibm.co.jp>, w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org, jboyer@pureedge.com
The schema and DTD probably need a slight tweak: <!ELEMENT XPath (#PCDATA) > <complexType name="XPathType" content='textOnly'> Something like that, anyway. Merlin r/reagle@w3.org/2002.03.07/16:59:12 >I'll defer your question to John but apoligize that I didn't publish the >editorially tweaked version (with some renaming, schema, and namespace). >The latest version is at: > http://www.w3.org/Signature/Drafts/xmldsig-xpath/ > >On Thursday 07 March 2002 00:29, TAMURA Kent wrote: >> In message "New XPath Filter Transform" >> >> on 02/02/07, Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org> writes: >> > Thoughts? (On these syntax issues, or implementation performance) >> > >> > [1] http://www.w3.org/Signature/Drafts/xmldsig-transform-xpath.html >> >> Does this transform ignore the input nodeset except the root >> node? Does a resultant nodeset contain a node which is not >> contained in the input nodeset but it is selected by >> SignatureFilter XPath expression? > >-- > >Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ >W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org >IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature/ >W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/ > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Baltimore Technologies plc will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any virus being passed on. This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by Baltimore MIMEsweeper for Content Security threats, including computer viruses. http://www.baltimore.com
Received on Friday, 8 March 2002 13:26:50 UTC