Re: minor post-last call exclusive c14n comment

Hi Merlin,

On Monday 14 January 2002 14:29, merlin wrote:
> One minor comment is that for c14n our algorithm URIs are:
> Whereas exclusive c14n uses:
> These are inconsistent in the use of a trailing #. If they
> are to remain inconsistent, perhaps section 4 should state
> 'may use the "WithComments" parameter'.

But this *is* consistent with the XML Signature spec: since we're 
allocating a specific namespace (instead of relying upon the URI of the 
actual final REC which is a pain before you get there) I'm erring on that 
side of consistency.

> Another is that the schema uses xmlns:dec; 'dec' seems
> unrelated.

Ok, changed to "ex" for exclusive canonicalization. I also properly 
qualified the example in seciton 4.


Joseph Reagle Jr.       
W3C Policy Analyst      
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair
W3C XML Encryption Chair

Received on Monday, 14 January 2002 17:35:13 UTC