- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 17:35:11 -0500
- To: merlin <merlin@baltimore.ie>, w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
Hi Merlin, On Monday 14 January 2002 14:29, merlin wrote: > One minor comment is that for c14n our algorithm URIs are: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-c14n-20010315 > http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-c14n-20010315#WithComments > > Whereas exclusive c14n uses: > > http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n# > http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#WithComments > > These are inconsistent in the use of a trailing #. If they > are to remain inconsistent, perhaps section 4 should state > 'may use the "WithComments" parameter'. But this *is* consistent with the XML Signature spec: since we're allocating a specific namespace (instead of relying upon the URI of the actual final REC which is a pain before you get there) I'm erring on that side of consistency. > Another is that the schema uses xmlns:dec; 'dec' seems > unrelated. Ok, changed to "ex" for exclusive canonicalization. I also properly qualified the example in seciton 4. -- Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature/ W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Monday, 14 January 2002 17:35:13 UTC