- From: Christian Geuer-Pollmann <geuer-pollmann@nue.et-inf.uni-siegen.de>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 21:45:08 +0100
- To: Rich Salz <rsalz@zolera.com>, reagle@w3.org
- Cc: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
--On Dienstag, 8. Januar 2002 21:26 -0500 Rich Salz <rsalz@zolera.com> wrote: > I agree, allowing both xml:lang and xml:space is better. I agree that the schema should be extended to allow somthing like this: <ds:Object xml:space="preserve"> <a> <dontEvenThinkToIndentThatYouBadProcessor /> <dontTouchMySurroundingSpaces /> </a> </ds:Object> Yes, that should (or even must?) be allowed. People should be able to protect their ds:Signatures agains wild'n'mad processors who want to beautify/indent every XML 'document' they process. I don't think that this has (negative) security implications, it'll even give Signatures to chance to be more stable - especially when you from SOAP folks and pipes of SOAP processors doing wild things with the msgs. Christian
Received on Friday, 11 January 2002 15:44:46 UTC