RFC 3275 on XML-Signature Syntax and Processing

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        RFC 3275

        Title:	    (Extensible Markup Language) XML-Signature Syntax
                    and Processing
        Author(s):  D. Eastlake 3rd, J. Reagle, D. Solo
        Status:     Standards Track
	Date:       March 2002
        Mailbox:    Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com, reagle@w3.org,
        Pages:      73
        Characters: 164198
        Obsoletes:  3075

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-2-03.txt

        URL:        ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3275.txt

This document specifies XML (Extensible Markup Language) digital
signature processing rules and syntax.  XML Signatures provide
integrity, message authentication, and/or signer authentication
services for data of any type, whether located within the XML that
includes the signature or elsewhere.

This document is a product of the XML Digital Signatures Working Group
of the IETF.

This is now a Draft Standard Protocol.

This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for
the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the
"Internet Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution
of this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF list and the RFC-DIST list.
Requests to be added to or deleted from the IETF distribution list
should be sent to IETF-REQUEST@IETF.ORG.  Requests to be
added to or deleted from the RFC-DIST distribution list should

Details on obtaining RFCs via FTP or EMAIL may be obtained by sending
an EMAIL message to rfc-info@RFC-EDITOR.ORG with the message body 
help: ways_to_get_rfcs.  For example:

        To: rfc-info@RFC-EDITOR.ORG
        Subject: getting rfcs

        help: ways_to_get_rfcs

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to RFC-Manager@RFC-EDITOR.ORG.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.echo 
Submissions for Requests for Comments should be sent to
RFC-EDITOR@RFC-EDITOR.ORG.  Please consult RFC 2223, Instructions to RFC
Authors, for further information.

Joyce K. Reynolds and Sandy Ginoza
USC/Information Sciences Institute


Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant Mail Reader 
implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version
of the RFCs.

Received on Thursday, 14 March 2002 12:23:06 UTC