public-ws-chor@w3.org from March 2003 by author

Abbie Barbir

• MICROSOFT: W3C 'NOT THE ONLY VEHICLE' FOR CHOREOGRAPHY (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Introduction (Wednesday, 19 March)

Assaf Arkin

• Re: Abstract messages [Was: Multi-Party Binding Scenario] (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: Abstract messages [Was: Multi-Party Binding Scenario] (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: More about the patient/receptionist/doctor use case. (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: Abstract messages [Was: Multi-Party Binding Scenario] (Thursday, 27 March)
• Abstract messages [Was: Multi-Party Binding Scenario] (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: More about the patient/receptionist/doctor use case. (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: Conversations and choreography (was RE: Definition of Terms) (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: Multi-Party Binding Scenario (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: Conversations and choreography (was RE: Definition of Terms) (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: Multi-Party Binding Scenario (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: Multi-Party Binding Scenario (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: Multi-Party Binding Scenario (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: Multi-Party Binding Scenario (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: Definition of Terms (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: requirements summary (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: Multi-Party Binding Scenario (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: Multi-Party Binding Scenario (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: Definition of Terms (Thursday, 20 March)
• RE: [Requirements] Non-requirement for MEPs (Thursday, 20 March)
• RE: [Requirements] Non-requirement for MEPs (Thursday, 20 March)
• RE: Definition of Terms (Wednesday, 19 March)
• RE: Definition of Terms (Wednesday, 19 March)
• RE: [Requirements] Non-requirement for MEPs (Wednesday, 19 March)
• RE: [Requirements] Non-requirement for MEPs (Wednesday, 19 March)
• RE: Presentation (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: Web services composition (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: Definition of Terms (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: Definition of Terms (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: Use case (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: Definition of Terms (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: Use case (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: Definition of Terms (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: Internal/External questions - scribed from f2f 1 (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: Web services composition (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: Definition of Terms (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: [Requirements] Non-requirement for MEPs (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Use case (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: Definition of Terms (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: Definition of Terms (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: [Requirements] Non-requirement for MEPs (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: General Choreography and Bi-lateral Choreography (Monday, 17 March)
• RE: General Choreography and Bi-lateral Choreography (Monday, 17 March)
• RE: General Choreography and Bi-lateral Choreography (Monday, 17 March)
• RE: General Choreography and Bi-lateral Choreography (Sunday, 16 March)
• RE: Choreography and Orchestration (Sunday, 16 March)
• RE: Choreography and Orchestration (Sunday, 16 March)
• RE: Choreography-related definitions in the Web Services Glossary (Sunday, 16 March)
• RE: Choreography-related definitions in the Web Services Glossary (Sunday, 16 March)
• RE: Choreography and Orchestration (Sunday, 16 March)
• RE: Choreography and Orchestration (Saturday, 15 March)
• RE: Choreography and Orchestration (Saturday, 15 March)

bhaugen

• Re: Internal/External questions - scribed from f2f 1 (Wednesday, 19 March)

Burdett, David

• RE: Scope of Choreography [was Uses of the WS Choreography Spec] (Monday, 31 March)
• RE: Abstract messages [Was: Multi-Party Binding Scenario] (Thursday, 27 March)
• RE: Abstract messages [Was: Multi-Party Binding Scenario] (Thursday, 27 March)
• RE: Abstract messages [Was: Multi-Party Binding Scenario] (Thursday, 27 March)
• RE: More about the patient/receptionist/doctor use case. (Thursday, 27 March)
• RE: Multi-Party Binding Scenario (Wednesday, 26 March)
• RE: Multi-Party Binding Scenario (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Use Case Submission (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: Multi-Party Binding Scenario (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: Multi-Party Binding Scenario (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: Multi-Party Binding Scenario (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: Multi-Party Binding Scenario (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: requirements summary (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: requirements summary (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: requirements summary (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: requirements summary (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: Multi-Party Binding Scenario (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: Scope of Choreography [was Uses of the WS Choreography Spec] (Monday, 24 March)
• RE: Uses of the WS Choreography Spec (Thursday, 20 March)
• RE: [Requirements] Non-requirement for MEPs (Wednesday, 19 March)
• RE: [Requirements] Non-requirement for MEPs (Wednesday, 19 March)
• RE: two-phase (from RE: General Choreography and Bi-lateral Chore ography) (Wednesday, 19 March)
• RE: [Requirements] Non-requirement for MEPs (Wednesday, 19 March)
• RE: Uses of the WS Choreography Spec (Wednesday, 19 March)
• RE: Internal/External questions - scribed from f2f 1 (Wednesday, 19 March)
• RE: two-phase (from RE: General Choreography and Bi-lateral Chore ography) (Wednesday, 19 March)
• RE: Definition of Terms (Wednesday, 19 March)
• RE: Definition of Terms (Wednesday, 19 March)
• RE: message formats and bindings (was MEPs). (Wednesday, 19 March)
• RE: Definition of Terms (Wednesday, 19 March)
• RE: Definition of Terms (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Introduction (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: Internal/External questions - scribed from f2f 1 (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: Definition of Terms (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: Definition of Terms (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: Use case (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: [Requirements] Non-requirement for MEPs (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: Definition of Terms (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Uses of the WS Choreography Spec (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: Definition of Terms (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: [Requirements] Non-requirement for MEPs (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: Definition of Terms (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: Definition of Terms (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: Case for multi-party choreography (Monday, 17 March)
• Definition of Terms (Monday, 17 March)
• RE: Choreography and Orchestration (Saturday, 15 March)

Carol McDonald

• articles (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: More about the patient/receptionist/doctor use case. (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: Presentation (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Sun Position Presentation (Saturday, 15 March)

Champion, Mike

• RE: Use Case - Provisioning (Monday, 31 March)

ChBussler@aol.com

• Re: Definition of Terms (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: [Requirements] Non-requirement for MEPs (Monday, 17 March)

Cummins, Fred A

• RE: Scope of Choreography [was Uses of the WS Choreography Spec] (Monday, 31 March)
• RE: Scope of Choreography [was Uses of the WS Choreography Spec] (Friday, 28 March)
• Scope of Choreography [was Uses of the WS Choreography Spec] (Friday, 21 March)

Daniel_Austin@grainger.com

• W. W. Grainger's presentation from the f2f meeting posted (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: requirements summary (Monday, 24 March)
• Re: Microsoft Quits Web Services Group After Two Days (Friday, 21 March)

David Chappell

• Regrets - Re: Agenda for3/25 concall (Tuesday, 25 March)

Ed Peters

• RE: Definition of Terms (Wednesday, 19 March)

Edwin Khodabakchian

• RE: More about the patient/receptionist/doctor use case. (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Conversations and choreography (was RE: Definition of Terms) (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: More about the patient/receptionist/doctor use case. (Tuesday, 25 March)
• More about the patient/receptionist/doctor use case. (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: Definition of Terms (Sunday, 23 March)
• RE: Definition of Terms (Wednesday, 19 March)
• RE: [Requirements] Non-requirement for MEPs (Wednesday, 19 March)
• RE: [Requirements] Non-requirement for MEPs (Wednesday, 19 March)
• RE: [Requirements] Non-requirement for MEPs (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: Choreography and Orchestration (Saturday, 15 March)

Fletcher, Tony

• 3 scopes not 2 (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: [Requirements] Non-requirement for MEPs (Monday, 17 March)
• [Requirements] Non-requirement for MEPs (Monday, 17 March)
• Tony Fletcher - Introduction (Monday, 17 March)

Francis McCabe

• Re: More about the patient/receptionist/doctor use case. (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: More about the patient/receptionist/doctor use case. (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: More about the patient/receptionist/doctor use case. (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: More about the patient/receptionist/doctor use case. (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: More about the patient/receptionist/doctor use case. (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: Conversations and choreography (was RE: Definition of Terms) (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Presentations (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: Web services composition (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: Web services composition (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Web services composition (Monday, 17 March)

Frank

• How to get 10,000 free hits per day. Make money for freeeee! (Monday, 3 March)

Furniss, Peter

• RE: More about the patient/receptionist/doctor use case. (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: Presentation (Wednesday, 19 March)
• two-phase (from RE: General Choreography and Bi-lateral Choreography) (Monday, 17 March)
• RE: General Choreography and Bi-lateral Choreography (Monday, 17 March)
• 2pc as bilateral (from RE: General Choreography and Bi-lateral Choreography) (Monday, 17 March)
• RE: General Choreography and Bi-lateral Choreography (Monday, 17 March)

Greg Ritzinger

• RE: More about the patient/receptionist/doctor use case.&In-Reply-To=<EDDE2977F3D216428E9033 (Wednesday, 26 March)

Howard N Smith

• Re: Dubray paper comments + questions (Saturday, 1 March)
• Re: Dubray paper comments + questions (Saturday, 1 March)

Huertas, Andre

• Introduction (Friday, 14 March)

Hugo Haas

• Choreography-related definitions in the Web Services Glossary (Friday, 14 March)

Jean-Jacques Dubray

• Article: Principles of SOA by Jason Bloomberg (Thursday, 27 March)
• RE: requirements summary (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: requirements summary (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: requirements summary (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: two-phase (from RE: General Choreography and Bi-lateral Choreography) (Wednesday, 19 March)
• RE: [Requirements] Non-requirement for MEPs (Wednesday, 19 March)
• RE: [Requirements] Non-requirement for MEPs (Wednesday, 19 March)
• RE: two-phase (from RE: General Choreography and Bi-lateral Choreography) (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: [Requirements] Non-requirement for MEPs (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: Use case (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: Definition of Terms (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: 3 scopes not 2 (Tuesday, 18 March)
• f2f presentation (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: Presentation (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: Dubray paper comments + questions (Monday, 3 March)

Jean-Jacques Moreau

• Re: message formats and bindings (was MEPs). (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: [Requirements] Non-requirement for MEPs (Tuesday, 18 March)

Jeff Mischkinsky

• Re: Introduction (Friday, 14 March)
• Introduction (Thursday, 13 March)

Jim Hendler

• Use Case - Service Composition (UMCP MIND Lab) (Tuesday, 1 April)
• re: Microsoft breaks with standards effort (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: Presentation (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Beyond WSDL (was Re: [Requirements] Non-requirement for MEPs) (Monday, 17 March)
• Internal/External questions - scribed from f2f 1 (Friday, 14 March)

Jon Dart

• Re: Abstract messages [Was: Multi-Party Binding Scenario] (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: Abstract messages [Was: Multi-Party Binding Scenario] (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: Multi-Party Binding Scenario (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: Multi-Party Binding Scenario (Tuesday, 25 March)
• HP paper on "web services orchestration" (Monday, 24 March)
• Re: requirements summary (Monday, 24 March)
• requirements summary (Monday, 24 March)
• Re: Definition of Terms (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: reliability, 2PC etc (from RE: General Choreography and Bi-lateral Choreography) (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: message formats and bindings (was MEPs). (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: [Requirements] Non-requirement for MEPs (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: Dubray paper comments + questions (Monday, 3 March)

Lipton, Paul

• Use Case - Provisioning (Sunday, 30 March)

Liu, Kevin

• Business Week Online: W3C seeks standards accord (Friday, 14 March)
• SAP position on Web Services Choreography - materials available (Thursday, 13 March)
• Introduction (Thursday, 13 March)

Mark Baker

• Re: Web services composition (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: Web services composition (Tuesday, 18 March)

Martin Chapman

• Agenda for 4/1 (Tuesday, 1 April)
• RE: Abstract messages [Was: Multi-Party Binding Scenario] (Thursday, 27 March)
• RE: More about the patient/receptionist/doctor use case (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Agenda for3/25 concall (Monday, 24 March)
• RE: Definition of Terms (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: Definition of Terms (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: [Requirements] Non-requirement for MEPs (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Presentation (Friday, 14 March)

Mayilraj Krishnan

• Re: [Requirements] Non-requirement for MEPs (Tuesday, 18 March)

Monica J. Martin

• Re: Multi-Party Binding Scenario (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: requirements summary (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: Scope of Choreography [was Uses of the WS Choreography Spec] (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: Uses of the WS Choreography Spec (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: [Requirements] Non-requirement for MEPs (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: [Requirements] Non-requirement for MEPs (Tuesday, 18 March)
• [ws-chor] 3/17/2003: Introduction (Monday, 17 March)
• Re: General Choreography and Bi-lateral Choreography (Monday, 17 March)
• Re: General Choreography and Bi-lateral Choreography (Monday, 17 March)
• [ws-chor] 3/14/2003: Introdction (Friday, 14 March)

Nickolas Kavantzas

• Introduction (Thursday, 13 March)

Patil, Sanjaykumar

• RE: Scope of Choreography [was Uses of the WS Choreography Spec] (Monday, 31 March)
• RE: Abstract messages [Was: Multi-Party Binding Scenario] (Thursday, 27 March)
• RE: requirements summary (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: requirements summary (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: requirements summary (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: requirements summary (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: [Requirements] Non-requirement for MEPs (Wednesday, 19 March)
• RE: [Requirements] Non-requirement for MEPs (Wednesday, 19 March)
• RE: [Requirements] Non-requirement for MEPs (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: Definition of Terms (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: Definition of Terms (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Business Messages Vs Signals (was RE: [Requirements] Non-requirement for MEPs) (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: Definition of Terms (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: [Requirements] Non-requirement for MEPs (Monday, 17 March)

Ricky Ho

• Re: More about the patient/receptionist/doctor use case. (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: More about the patient/receptionist/doctor use case. (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: Abstract messages [Was: Multi-Party Binding Scenario] (Thursday, 27 March)
• RE: More about the patient/receptionist/doctor use case. (Thursday, 27 March)
• Re: More about the patient/receptionist/doctor use case. (Thursday, 27 March)
• RE: More about the patient/receptionist/doctor use case. (Thursday, 27 March)
• RE: More about the patient/receptionist/doctor use case. (Wednesday, 26 March)
• RE: More about the patient/receptionist/doctor use case. (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: Definition of Terms (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: Multi-Party Binding Scenario (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: Multi-Party Binding Scenario (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: More about the patient/receptionist/doctor use case. (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: More about the patient/receptionist/doctor use case. (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: Multi-Party Binding Scenario (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: requirements summary (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Multi-Party Binding Scenario (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: requirements summary (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: Scope of Choreography [was Uses of the WS Choreography Spec] (Monday, 24 March)
• RE: two-phase (from RE: General Choreography and Bi-lateral Choreography) (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: Definition of Terms (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Case for multi-party choreography (Monday, 17 March)
• RE: General Choreography and Bi-lateral Choreography (Monday, 17 March)
• RE: Choreography-related definitions in the Web Services Glossary (Sunday, 16 March)
• RE: Choreography and Orchestration (Sunday, 16 March)
• RE: Choreography and Orchestration (Sunday, 16 March)
• General Choreography and Bi-lateral Choreography (Sunday, 16 March)
• Choreography and Orchestration (Saturday, 15 March)
• Introduction (Wednesday, 12 March)

simon.2.thompson@bt.com

• DAML-S thoughts. (Friday, 21 March)

Stephen White

• RE: More about the patient/receptionist/doctor use case. (Thursday, 27 March)
• RE: More about the patient/receptionist/doctor use case. (Thursday, 27 March)
• RE: More about the patient/receptionist/doctor use case. (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Microsoft Quits Web Services Group After Two Days (Thursday, 20 March)
• RE: Definition of Terms (Wednesday, 19 March)
• RE: Internal/External questions - scribed from f2f 1 (Tuesday, 18 March)

Steve Ross-Talbot

• Steve's use case (Thursday, 27 March)
• MIRC for OSX (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: Use case (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: [Requirements] Non-requirement for MEPs (Tuesday, 18 March)
• RE: [Requirements] Non-requirement for MEPs (Monday, 17 March)

Yaron Y. Goland

• Regrets for 4/1 and 4/8 con calls (Wednesday, 26 March)
• WS-CallBack (Wednesday, 26 March)
• RE: two-phase (from RE: General Choreography and Bi-lateral Choreography) (Tuesday, 18 March)

Yoko SEKI

• Re: Presentation (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: Uses of the WS Choreography Spec (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: Internal/External questions - scribed from f2f 1 (Wednesday, 19 March)

Yves Lafon

• Re: Microsoft Quits Web Services Group After Two Days (Friday, 21 March)

Last message date: Monday, 31 March 2003 20:16:52 UTC