- From: Francis McCabe <fgm@fla.fujitsu.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 09:10:30 -0800
- To: "Stephen White" <swhite@SeeBeyond.com>
- Cc: "Ricky Ho" <riho@cisco.com>, <edwink@collaxa.com>, <jdart@tibco.com>, <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
Steve: On Wednesday, March 26, 2003, at 09:30 AM, Stephen White wrote: > I was having trouble following the use case as a text description, so > I made up a couple of diagrams to help me follow the example. There is > a diagram with a 3-party choreography (3Part_Pat-Recp-Doc.jpg) and > three separate diagrams of the individual 2-party choreographies > (within 3_2Part_Pat-Recp-Doc.jpg). I am sending in the diagrams to > help those like me who need to see pictures. > One issue behind diagrams like these is that (a) they presuppose an ordering relationship between messages between the receptionist and the patient that is dependent on message between the doctor and the receptionist. This is not accurate. And (b) that there is one receptionist/patient interaction with every receptionist/doctor interaction, again not sustainable; at least, the interleaving is not so straightforward. Frank
Received on Thursday, 27 March 2003 12:11:09 UTC