RE: Abstract messages [Was: Multi-Party Binding Scenario]

Just catching up on the emails on this thread which I generally agree with.

I would actually go for option 3 that you describe as I think you will find
that within one choreography, you want to use different types of binding
some of which are not even web services.

... but I do think we are getting close.

David

-----Original Message-----
From: Jon Dart [mailto:jdart@tibco.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 1:17 PM
To: Assaf Arkin
Cc: Patil Sanjaykumar; Burdett David; Ricky Ho; public-ws-chor@w3.org
Subject: Re: Abstract messages [Was: Multi-Party Binding Scenario]


I've discussed this internally with my colleague Bill Eidson, and we 
think it is ok to have the choreography depend on abstract WSDL. The 
implication is that you need to have a WSDL binding to whatever message 
format and/or protocol you are using. I realize others may have 
different opinions.

--Jon

Assaf Arkin wrote:

> The question is, is there any technical justification for doing 3 
> instead of 1 because at the end of the day inspite the additional layer 
> introduced by 3 it makes our job easier?
> 
> arkin