- From: Jon Dart <jdart@tibco.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 13:16:43 -0800
- To: Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com>
- CC: "Patil Sanjaykumar" <sanjay.patil@iona.com>, "Burdett David" <david.burdett@commerceone.com>, Ricky Ho <riho@cisco.com>, public-ws-chor@w3.org
I've discussed this internally with my colleague Bill Eidson, and we think it is ok to have the choreography depend on abstract WSDL. The implication is that you need to have a WSDL binding to whatever message format and/or protocol you are using. I realize others may have different opinions. --Jon Assaf Arkin wrote: > The question is, is there any technical justification for doing 3 > instead of 1 because at the end of the day inspite the additional layer > introduced by 3 it makes our job easier? > > arkin
Received on Thursday, 27 March 2003 16:16:50 UTC