- From: Ricky Ho <riho@cisco.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 18:12:17 -0800
- To: public-ws-chor@w3.org
Some thoughts about role binding in multi-party choreography. In addition to message exchange sequence, does the choreography also specify the sequence how roles will be binded and where rebind can happen ? ============================================================================================================= YES. This increase the complexity of multi-party scenario. Because the message exchange sequence now has a coupling with the role (re)binding sequence. When does the choreography get instantiated ? =================================== In the choreography should define at least one role that can start the "conversation" (ie: a "choreography instance"). 1) PartyA (who wants to play RoleA) propose a conversation by sending a message to PartyB (who PartyA want her to play RoleB). The message contains at least two role bindings (PartyA/RoleA, and PartyB/RoleB) 2) After receive this message, PartyB can agree or disagree to bind to RoleB of the conversation. If she disagree, then the conversation terminates there. 3) If PartyB agrees to play RoleB, then the conversation starts successfully. In other words, when a choreography starts successfully, there will be at least 2 roles being binded. When does the bindings of other roles happen ? =================================== The choreography defines who (RoleA or RoleB) can propose bindings of these other roles. Basically the message exchange sequence between RoleA and RoleB defines when these other bindings can happen. The binding to other parties has an extra step. For example, it is possible that PartyA propose binding of RoleC by PartyC and even communicate this knowledge with PartyB before it has actually contact PartyC. At some later point, PartyA or PartyB will actually send a message to PartyC which at that time, will confirm the binding of PartyC. On the other hand, PartyA or PartyB can send an ont-of-band message to PartyC. PartyC will then send a message to PartyA or B and confirm the binding. Does all parties always know bindings of all roles ? ===================================== Not necessary. PartyA decide to bind RoleC with PartyC, but she doesn't need to notify PartyB. Even if she does, she may communicate with PartyB at a later point in time but not immediate. Does all roles rebindable ? ==================== Again up to the choreography to define. I guess the 2 initial roles are likely to be not rebindable. Comments ? Best regards, Ricky
Received on Monday, 24 March 2003 21:12:38 UTC