- From: Ricky Ho <riho@cisco.com>
- Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 08:10:14 -0800
- To: public-ws-chor@w3.org
- Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20030315075057.02898318@franklin.cisco.com>
I try to put up my own definition of "Choreography" and "Orchestration" and use a simple buyer/seller use case to illustrate what I mean. I'm particularly interested to see how the "Choreography" portion of this simple example get represented by WSCI and BPSS. 1 Definitions 1.1 Choreography ================= CHOREOGRAPHY defines the public part of a bi-lateral interaction between two communicating parties. It formalize a contractual agreement between these parties. CHOREOGRAPHY defines TWO communicating parties in terms of ROLES, which will be bound to the actual business entity when the choreography instance starts. The binding doesn’t change throughout the lifecycle of the CHOREOGRAPHY INSTANCE. CHOREOGRAPHY defines a set of “SHARED STATES” between the TWO communicating parties. CHOREOGRAPHY defines the TRANSITIONS of SHARED STATES in terms of MEP, where one ROLE sends a message to another ROLE. In other words, the purpose of MEP is to align the SHARED STATES between the two ROLES. CHOREOGRAPHY does NOT reflect the perspective of a single party. It can be taken by any parties who wants to play a role within it. The CHOREOGRAPHY INSTANCE starts when the following occurs • One party sends the first message (which propose the initial SHARED STATES) to another party. • This another party verifies that the initial SHARED STATES meets the pre-requisite to start the CHOREOGRAPHY 1.2 Orchestration ================= ORCHESTRATION defines the private part of the implementation of a particular party who plays a ROLE in the CHOREOGRAPHY. It formalize the execution logic of that party throughout the message exchanges. ORCHESTRATION realize a particular ROLE of a CHOREOGRAPHY. Therefore, ORCHESTRATION needs to be conformed with the CHOREOGRAPHY. ORCHESTRATION can potentially span across multiple CHOREOGRAPHIES. Therefore, CHOREOGRAPHY INSTANCES can form inter-dependent relationship at the ORCHESTRATION level. Note here that I try to restrict choreography to 2 parties and disallow changes of role binding throughout the lifecycle of choreography instance. The downside is now a multi-party interaction needs to be broken down into multiple bi-lateral choreographies and their inter-dependencies is not externalized at the choreography level. It is up to the implementation (which is the orchestration) to determine such inter-dependencies. The purpose of these restrictions is to simplify the choreography model which I think still address 80% of the real life use cases. I would like to see where it breaks before remove this restriction. 2 Use Case Example Lets look at a very simple example of the product purchase interaction between a BUYER, a SELLER, and a COURIER. • The buyer send a PURCHASE ORDER message to the seller. • The seller check the credit history of the seller as well as the product availability and decide either to accept or reject the purchase order. • If the seller decide to reject the order, he send an ORDER REJECTION message back to the buyer. The interaction ends here. • If the seller decide to accept the order, he will arrange shipment of the purchased product by selecting one of his preferred couriers. • The selected courier pickup the product from the seller and deliver to the buyer’s location. The courier start a new interaction with the buyer by sending a SHIPMENT NOTICATION message. • The buyer verifies the product is delivered in good shape and send back a SHIPMENT RECEIVED message to the courier as well as FULFILLMENT COMPLETE message to the seller. Otherwise, the buyer sends back a SHIPMENT REJECTED message to the courier as well as FULFILLMENT FAILED message to the seller. 3 Illustration 3.1 Choreography ================= There are four possible CHOREOGRAPHIES in this example • Product Purchase (Buyer and Seller) • Credit Checking (Seller and CreditCheck provider) • Arrange Delivery (Seller and Courier) • Shipment Delivery (Courier and Buyer) For the purpose of this discussion, I’ll focus in the first one. 3.1.1 Public / Shared States ======================= Product Purchase choreography defines the following “PUBLIC STATES” • OrderNo • OrderStatus (“Submitted”, “Accepted”, “Rejected”, “Delivered”, “Returned”, “Terminated”) • ShipmentNo 3.1.2 Message Exchanges ====================== Product Purchase Choreography defines the PUBLIC STATE TRANSITIONS in terms of the following message exchanges … Start State = “submitted”: (OrderStatus=“submitted”) Triggered by: when buyer send a “PurchaseOrder” to sender State = “accepted”: (OrderStatus= “accepted”, OrderNo, ShipmentNo) From State “submitted” Triggered by when seller send a “OrderAcceptance” message to buyer State = “rejected”: (OrderStatus= “rejected”) From State “submitted” Triggered by when seller send a “OrderRejection” message to buyer End State = “delivered”: (OrderStatus= “delivered”, OrderNo, ShipmentNo) From State “accepted” Triggered by when buyer send a “FulfillmentCompleted” message to seller End State = “returned”: (OrderStatus= “returned”, OrderNo, ShipmentNo) From State “accepted” Triggered by when buyer send a “FulfillmentFailed” message to seller 3.2 Orchestration ================= Here is the Orchestration of the Seller within the Product Purchase Choreography Wait for receiving a PurchaseOrder message from buyer Starts a new instance of “Credit Check” choreography by invoke the CreditCheck web services. After receiving the response, this “Credit Check” choreography instance is terminated. Invoke an internal web service to check the stock level of product availability If (credit is OK and product is available) { Invoke an UDDI search to lookup shipping companies. Select one courier based on company specific decision logic Starts a new instance of “Arrange Shipment” choreography by invoking the ShipmentHandling web services. Send an “OrderAcceptance” message (which include the shipment No) to the buyer Wait for receiving either “FulfillmentComplete” or “FulfillmentFailed” message from the buyer and update the OrderStatus correspondingly. The choreography instance ends here. If the OrderStatus is “return”, log into the customer care DB. } else { Send an “OrderRejection” message to the buyer } As you can see, some activities within the orchestration is not visible by the buyer and hence is the private part of the seller. - Check the credit history - Check the product availability - Start another choreography with the courier Comments and Thoughts ? Best regards, Ricky
Received on Saturday, 15 March 2003 13:54:17 UTC