public-webapps-github@w3.org from March 2015 by author

.DS_Storoz

Re: [ServiceWorker] Pattern for handling fingerprinted assets in cache? (#657) (Wednesday, 18 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Pattern for handling fingerprinted assets in cache? (#657) (Wednesday, 18 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Pattern for handling fingerprinted assets in cache? (#657) (Wednesday, 18 March)
[ServiceWorker] Pattern for handling fingerprinted assets? (#657) (Wednesday, 18 March)

Aaron

Re: [streams] Add readableAmount getter to ReadableByteStream (#279) (Saturday, 14 March)

Adria

Re: [ServiceWorker] Clients & postMessage (#609) (Friday, 6 March)

Alex Lu

Re: [manifest] Are "hosted apps" in scope? (#340) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [manifest] Are "hosted apps" in scope? (#340) (Tuesday, 24 March)
Re: [manifest] Resolve start_url against manifest URL (#330) (Wednesday, 18 March)
Re: [manifest] A way to link to related applications (#326) (Wednesday, 18 March)
Re: [manifest] Resolve start_url against manifest URL (#330) (Wednesday, 18 March)
Re: [manifest] Native API Permissions (#319) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [manifest] A way to link to related applications (#326) (Saturday, 7 March)
Re: [manifest] Convert "Icon object" into a generic "image object" (#327) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [manifest] Native API Permissions (#319) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [manifest] A way to link to related applications (#326) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [manifest] Native API Permissions (#319) (Thursday, 5 March)

Alex Russell

Re: [spec-reviews] http-problem (#37) (Monday, 23 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Response streaming and SW lifetime (#651) (Monday, 23 March)
[spec-reviews] Update CSS Regions.md (#48) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] client objects should have an .id (#634) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] client objects should have an .id (#634) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker objects should have an .id (#635) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker objects should have an .id (#635) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Cause a Content-Security-Policy: sandbox header to unregister the Service Worker at that scriptURL. (#389) (Tuesday, 10 March)
Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Tuesday, 10 March)
Re: [manifest] Add theme_color member (closes #225) (#325) (Tuesday, 10 March)
Re: [manifest] A way to link to related applications (#326) (Tuesday, 10 March)
Re: [push-api] Add optional userVisibleOnly parameter to register & hasPermission (#87) (Tuesday, 10 March)
Re: [spec-reviews] permissions API (#45) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] importScripts() should throw? (#642) (Wednesday, 4 March)

Alexander Abashkin

Re: [fetch] Add timeout option (#20) (Thursday, 19 March)

alxlu

[manifest] Native API Permissions (#319) (Monday, 2 March)

Andrea Giammarchi

Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Cancelling HTTP fetch (#592) (Tuesday, 24 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Cancelling HTTP fetch (#592) (Tuesday, 24 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Cancelling HTTP fetch (#592) (Tuesday, 24 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Cancelling HTTP fetch (#592) (Tuesday, 24 March)

Anne van Kesteren

Re: [fetch] Add support for federated token binding to fetch (#30) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] HEAD request on Cache API should not return response with body (#655) (Tuesday, 31 March)
[fetch] Clear response body under certain conditions (#31) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] HEAD request on Cache API should not return response with body (#655) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] HEAD request on Cache API should not return response with body (#655) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] HEAD request on Cache API should not return response with body (#655) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] HEAD request on Cache API should not return response with body (#655) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [fetch] Add support for federated token binding to fetch (#30) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [fetch] consider different default context value than "fetch" for new Request() (#29) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] object/embed (#249) (Saturday, 28 March)
Re: [fetch] consider different default context value than "fetch" for new Request() (#29) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] what should Cache put operations do if the body errors out after resolving promise? (#665) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache should sanitize the stored Request in put/add/addAll (#664) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] what should Cache put operations do if the body errors out after resolving promise? (#665) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] Operate on internal response (#23) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] Operate on internal response (#23) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] consider providing a json serializer for Request and Response (#22) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] consider providing a json serializer for Request and Response (#22) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] Deprecate fetch (#28) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] Prevent modifying headers on Responses (#24) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] Prevent modifying headers on Responses (#24) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Resources shared across documents controlled by different service workers (#244) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [fetch] URLs with username/password (#26) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Returning a FetchPromise from fetch() (#625) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Cancelling HTTP fetch (#592) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Cancelling HTTP fetch (#592) (Thursday, 26 March)
[fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [fetch] Distinguishing between errors (#25) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Resources shared across documents controlled by different service workers (#244) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Resources shared across documents controlled by different service workers (#244) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker constructor instead of navigator.serviceWorker (#660) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Allowing multiple scopes (& should scopes be primary key?) (#566) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Response streaming and SW lifetime (#651) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Cancelling HTTP fetch (#592) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Returning a FetchPromise from fetch() (#625) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Cancelling HTTP fetch (#592) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Pattern for handling fingerprinted assets in cache? (#657) (Wednesday, 18 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Pattern for handling fingerprinted assets in cache? (#657) (Wednesday, 18 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Add Quota Management APIs to the SW Global Execution Scope (#229) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Add Quota Management APIs to the SW Global Execution Scope (#229) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Interacting with HTTP/2 push (#215) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Interacting with HTTP/2 push (#215) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Define security policy (#113) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Define security policy (#113) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] HEAD request on Cache API should not return response with body (#655) (Tuesday, 17 March)
[ServiceWorker] HEAD request on Cache API should not return response with body (#655) (Tuesday, 17 March)
[dom] Convert DOM to use bikeshed (#15) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [permissions] Should Permissions be an interface with static objects? (#11) (Tuesday, 17 March)
[dom] Indicate GitHub issues can now be used (#14) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [fetch] Operate on internal response (#23) (Tuesday, 17 March)
[ServiceWorker] Navigate and redirects (#654) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [fullscreen] Add transform:none to the UA style sheet (#1) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [fullscreen] Add transform:none to the UA style sheet (#1) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [fetch] Operate on internal response (#23) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Remove ignoreMethod (#653) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Prefetch/prerender & Client id (#210) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Prefetch/prerender & Client id (#210) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [fetch] Operate on internal response (#23) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [fetch] Operate on internal response (#23) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [fetch] Prevent modifying headers on Responses (#24) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [fetch] Operate on internal response (#23) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Prefetch/prerender & Client id (#210) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Cancelling HTTP fetch (#592) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Association between a service worker and global objects (#652) (Saturday, 14 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Prefetch/prerender & Client id (#210) (Saturday, 14 March)
Re: [fetch] Prevent modifying headers on Responses (#24) (Saturday, 14 March)
[fetch] Operate on internal response (#23) (Friday, 13 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Define environment settings object for service workers (#526) (Friday, 13 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Prefetch/prerender & Client id (#210) (Friday, 13 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Event queuing model for SW (#649) (Friday, 13 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Event queuing model for SW (#649) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Define environment settings object for service workers (#526) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] object/embed (#249) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] object/embed (#249) (Thursday, 12 March)
[ServiceWorker] Response streaming and SW lifetime (#651) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Cause a Content-Security-Policy: sandbox header to unregister the Service Worker at that scriptURL. (#389) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] object/embed (#249) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Drop client from fetchEvent/request? (#575) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Drop client from fetchEvent/request? (#575) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Should UUID for unique IDs be mandated? (#647) (Tuesday, 10 March)
Re: [filesystem-api] Define AbortableProgressPromise (#2) (Monday, 9 March)
Re: [filesystem-api] Update links to subresources (#3) (Monday, 9 March)
Re: [filesystem-api] Update links to subresources (#3) (Monday, 9 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we replace event.default() with something less magic? (#607) (Monday, 9 March)
[filesystem-api] Update links to subresources (#3) (Monday, 9 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] openWindow(url)'s same origin check should be done against the origin of the final response's url? (#646) (Monday, 9 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] openWindow(url)'s same origin check should be done against the origin of the final response's url? (#646) (Monday, 9 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we replace event.default() with something less magic? (#607) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] How do I get from a script to a service worker registration (#504) (Friday, 6 March)
[ServiceWorker] FetchEvent not defined (#645) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [fetch] consider providing a json serializer for Request and Response (#22) (Wednesday, 4 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] importScripts() should throw? (#642) (Wednesday, 4 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] importScripts() should throw? (#642) (Monday, 2 March)
[ServiceWorker] Expose environment ids? (#643) (Monday, 2 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] importScripts() should throw? (#642) (Sunday, 1 March)

Anssi Kostiainen

Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [manifest] Add related_applications and prefer_related_applications. (#344) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [manifest] Resolve start_url against manifest URL (#330) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [manifest] Resolve start_url against manifest URL (#330) (Wednesday, 18 March)
Re: [manifest] Resolve start_url against manifest URL (#330) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Monday, 9 March)
Re: [manifest] A way to link to related applications (#326) (Monday, 9 March)
Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Monday, 9 March)
Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Monday, 9 March)
Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Monday, 9 March)
Re: [manifest-csp] Minor editorial suggestion for Abstract (#7) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [manifest-csp] Minor editorial suggestion for Abstract (#7) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Friday, 6 March)

Arthur Barstow

Re: [manifest] Fixed scopeURL typo (closes #320) (cddb540) (Friday, 6 March)
[manifest] Clarify "scope" in step #3 of Section 3 (#320) (Tuesday, 3 March)

Arthur Stolyar

Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Saturday, 28 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] Deprecate fetch (#28) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 27 March)
[fetch] Deprecate fetch (#28) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Cancelling HTTP fetch (#592) (Tuesday, 24 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Returning a FetchPromise from fetch() (#625) (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Returning a FetchPromise from fetch() (#625) (Sunday, 1 March)

Arun Ranganathan

Re: [filesystem-api] Update links to subresources (#3) (Monday, 9 March)

astearns

Re: [spec-reviews] Update CSS Regions.md (#48) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [spec-reviews] Update CSS Regions.md (#48) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [spec-reviews] Update CSS Regions.md (#48) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [spec-reviews] Update CSS Regions.md (#48) (Wednesday, 25 March)

awalGarg

Re: [fetch] consider providing a json serializer for Request and Response (#22) (Friday, 6 March)

balfanz

Re: [fetch] Add support for federated token binding to fetch (#30) (Tuesday, 31 March)
[fetch] Add support for federated token binding to fetch (#30) (Monday, 30 March)

Ben Francis

Re: [manifest] Add related_applications and prefer_related_applications. (#344) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [manifest] Add related_applications and prefer_related_applications. (#344) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [manifest] Add related_applications and prefer_related_applications. (#344) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [manifest] Are "hosted apps" in scope? (#340) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [manifest] Are "hosted apps" in scope? (#340) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [manifest] A way to link to related applications (#326) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [manifest] A way to link to related applications (#326) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [manifest] Are "hosted apps" in scope? (#340) (Tuesday, 24 March)
Re: [manifest] A way to link to related applications (#326) (Tuesday, 24 March)
Re: [manifest] A way to link to related applications (#326) (Tuesday, 24 March)
Re: [manifest] Are "hosted apps" in scope? (#340) (Monday, 23 March)
Re: [manifest] Integration with service workers (#161) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [manifest] shouldn't the default scope be bounded? (#332) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Wednesday, 18 March)
Re: [manifest] Resolve start_url against manifest URL (#330) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [manifest] shouldn't the default scope be bounded? (#332) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [manifest] shouldn't the default scope be bounded? (#332) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Friday, 13 March)
[manifest] Resolve start_url against manifest URL (#330) (Friday, 13 March)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Friday, 13 March)
Re: [manifest] Native API Permissions (#319) (Monday, 9 March)
Re: [manifest] Add a lang member (#322) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [manifest] Added lang member (closes #322) (cbd8343) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [manifest] Add theme_color member (closes #225) (#325) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [manifest] Add theme_color member (closes #225) (#325) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [manifest] Add theme_color member (closes #225) (#325) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [manifest] A way to link to related applications (#326) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [manifest] Native API Permissions (#319) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [manifest] Native API Permissions (#319) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [manifest] Native API Permissions (#319) (Thursday, 5 March)

Ben Kelly

Re: [ServiceWorker] Response streaming and SW lifetime (#651) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Response streaming and SW lifetime (#651) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Service Worker doesn't catch favicon requests (#668) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Service Worker doesn't catch favicon requests (#668) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] HEAD request on Cache API should not return response with body (#655) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] should Cache support VARY:*,otherheader or only VARY:* (#656) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] should Cache support VARY:*,otherheader or only VARY:* (#656) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] should Cache support VARY:*,otherheader or only VARY:* (#656) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [streams] consider allowing a stream to be removed from a pipeline (#307) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] what should Cache put operations do if the body errors out after resolving promise? (#665) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] what should Cache put operations do if the body errors out after resolving promise? (#665) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] what should Cache put operations do if the body errors out after resolving promise? (#665) (Friday, 27 March)
[ServiceWorker] what should Cache put operations do if the body errors out after resolving promise? (#665) (Friday, 27 March)
[fetch] consider different default context value than "fetch" for new Request() (#29) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [streams] consider allowing a stream to be removed from a pipeline (#307) (Friday, 27 March)
[ServiceWorker] Cache should sanitize the stored Request in put/add/addAll (#664) (Friday, 27 March)
[streams] consider allowing a stream to be removed from a pipeline (#307) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Resources shared across documents controlled by different service workers (#244) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [streams] can streams be transferred via postMessage()? (#276) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [streams] can streams be transferred via postMessage()? (#276) (Tuesday, 24 March)
Re: [streams] can streams be transferred via postMessage()? (#276) (Tuesday, 24 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Response streaming and SW lifetime (#651) (Monday, 23 March)
Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Allowing multiple scopes (& should scopes be primary key?) (#566) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Allowing multiple scopes (& should scopes be primary key?) (#566) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Pattern for handling fingerprinted assets in cache? (#657) (Wednesday, 18 March)
Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302) (Wednesday, 18 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Pattern for handling fingerprinted assets in cache? (#657) (Wednesday, 18 March)
Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302) (Wednesday, 18 March)
Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302) (Wednesday, 18 March)
[ServiceWorker] should Cache support VARY:*,otherheader or only VARY:* (#656) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] HEAD request on Cache API should not return response with body (#655) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Remove ignoreMethod (#653) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Remove ignoreMethod (#653) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] under what conditions should sandboxed iframes be intercepted? (#648) (Thursday, 12 March)
[ServiceWorker] under what conditions should sandboxed iframes be intercepted? (#648) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [fetch] consider providing a json serializer for Request and Response (#22) (Wednesday, 4 March)
[fetch] consider providing a json serializer for Request and Response (#22) (Tuesday, 3 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] importScripts() should throw? (#642) (Monday, 2 March)

Benjamin Gruenbaum

Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 31 March)

Boris Zbarsky

Bradley Meck

Re: [streams] Performance Check vs. Node Streams (#304) (Saturday, 21 March)
[streams] Performance Check vs. Node Streams (#304) (Friday, 20 March)

Brian Blakely

[ServiceWorker] Send a changelog to the UA (#650) (Wednesday, 11 March)

Cameron McCormack

Re: [webidl] Add a platform object [[Set]] internal method so we can have prototype setters show through even if an object has a named property of the same name and can have named creators work correctly on [OverrideBuiltins] objects even if thre is a property with the same name on the prototype. (#45) (Thursday, 12 March)

Chris Dickinson

Re: [streams] What should we call ReadableByteStream.prototype.getBYOBReader()? (#294) (Thursday, 12 March)

Cătălin Badea

[ServiceWorker] Association between a service worker and global objects (#652) (Friday, 13 March)

Cătălin Mariș

[manifest] The use of the `.manifest` file extension may be problematic / confusing ? (#346) (Monday, 30 March)

Daniel Appelquist

[spec-reviews] Revise CSS regions draft based on outcome of 19-March discussion (#47) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSS Regions Review Draft (#44) (Tuesday, 17 March)

Daniel Davis

Re: [gamepad] Specification (#1) (Tuesday, 17 March)

Dave Methvin

Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 26 March)

David Frank

[fetch] Distinguishing between errors (#25) (Friday, 20 March)

David Von Lehman

Re: [manifest] Are "hosted apps" in scope? (#340) (Monday, 23 March)
Re: [manifest] Graceful handling of no network connectivity in hosted apps (#339) (Monday, 23 March)
Re: [manifest] Graceful handling of no network connectivity in hosted apps (#339) (Monday, 23 March)
[manifest] Graceful handling of no network connectivity in hosted apps (#339) (Monday, 23 March)

Dimitri Glazkov

Re: [webcomponents] inflexible extends as fixed element type (#33) (Saturday, 7 March)
Re: [webcomponents] inflexible extends as fixed element type (#33) (Saturday, 7 March)
Re: [webcomponents] Link to CSS Scoping module spec? (#37) (Saturday, 7 March)
Re: [webcomponents] Link to CSS Scoping module spec? (#37) (Saturday, 7 March)

Domenic Denicola

[streams] Implement teeing, plus a bunch of stage-setting tweaks (#311) (Tuesday, 31 March)
[permissions] Fix typo around Promise.all (#21) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [permissions] Version of the API that should be simple, extensible and ready for MVP. (#20) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [permissions] Version of the API that should be simple, extensible and ready for MVP. (#20) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [permissions] Version of the API that should be simple, extensible and ready for MVP. (#20) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [permissions] Version of the API that should be simple, extensible and ready for MVP. (#20) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [permissions] Version of the API that should be simple, extensible and ready for MVP. (#20) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [permissions] Version of the API that should be simple, extensible and ready for MVP. (#20) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [streams] Making the "queue manipulator" its own class (#309) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [streams] Introduce readable stream controller class (#310) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [streams] Introduce readable stream controller class (#310) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [streams] Implementation of net.Socket (#305) (Tuesday, 31 March)
[streams] Introduce readable stream controller class (#310) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [streams] Making the "queue manipulator" its own class (#309) (Monday, 30 March)
[streams] Making the "queue manipulator (#309) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [streams] Made "Multiple readers can access the stream in sequence" test robust (#306) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [streams] Made "Multiple readers can access the stream in sequence" test robust (#306) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [streams] can streams be transferred via postMessage()? (#276) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [streams] can streams be transferred via postMessage()? (#276) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [streams] can streams be transferred via postMessage()? (#276) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [streams] Made "Multiple readers can access the stream in sequence" test robust (#306) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [streams] can streams be transferred via postMessage()? (#276) (Tuesday, 24 March)
Re: [streams] can streams be transferred via postMessage()? (#276) (Tuesday, 24 March)
Re: [streams] can streams be transferred via postMessage()? (#276) (Tuesday, 24 March)
Re: [spec-reviews] http-problem (#37) (Monday, 23 March)
Re: [spec-reviews] http-problem (#37) (Monday, 23 March)
Re: [streams] Performance Check vs. Node Streams (#304) (Saturday, 21 March)
Re: [streams] Performance Check vs. Node Streams (#304) (Saturday, 21 March)
Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [spec-reviews] http-problem (#37) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [streams] Byte streams: write up design rationales and vision for how they are used/what they enable (#177) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [fetch] Distinguishing between errors (#25) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [streams] Generalized and precise flow/buffer control (#301) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [streams] What types does ReadableByteStream's reader's read(x) accept and return? (#295) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [streams] Update ReadableByteStream to follow the style rule employed for the main... (#283) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [streams] Update ReadableByteStream to follow the style rule employed for the main... (#283) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [streams] Throw on underlying source double-close or double-error (#303) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [streams] Warning misbehaving underlying sources (#298) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [streams] What types does ReadableByteStream's reader's read(x) accept and return? (#295) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [streams] What types does ReadableByteStream's reader's read(x) accept and return? (#295) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [streams] What types does ReadableByteStream's reader's read(x) accept and return? (#295) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Cancelling HTTP fetch (#592) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Cancelling HTTP fetch (#592) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Cancelling HTTP fetch (#592) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302) (Thursday, 19 March)
[streams] Throw on underlying source double-close or double-error (#303) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302) (Wednesday, 18 March)
Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302) (Wednesday, 18 March)
Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302) (Wednesday, 18 March)
[streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302) (Wednesday, 18 March)
Re: [streams] Move algorithms to Ecmarkup/Ecmarkdown (02e0a64) (Wednesday, 18 March)
Re: [streams] ReadableByteStreams: missing APIs (#176) (Wednesday, 18 March)
Re: [streams] Generalized and precise flow/buffer control (#301) (Wednesday, 18 March)
Re: [streams] Add some more texts to Requirements.md about byte streams (#299) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [streams] Warning misbehaving underlying sources (#298) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [streams] Warning misbehaving underlying sources (#298) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [streams] What types does ReadableByteStream's reader's read(x) accept and return? (#295) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [streams] Byte streams: write up design rationales and vision for how they are used/what they enable (#177) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [streams] Investigate (F)RP literature (#88) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [streams] Investigate (F)RP literature (#88) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [streams] simpler, less stateful basic streams? (#104) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [streams] simpler, less stateful basic streams? (#104) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [streams] Warning misbehaving underlying sources (#298) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [streams] Warning misbehaving underlying sources (#298) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [streams] Add BufferFeedableReadableByteStream (#282) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [streams] Add BufferFeedableReadableByteStream (#282) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [streams] Factor out portions of a test suite that can be run against already-constructed streams (#264) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [streams] Requirement on promises equality (#266) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [streams] Change the model for ReadableStream to have async read() (#296) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [spec-reviews] http-problem (#37) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [streams] What types does ReadableByteStream's reader's read(x) accept and return? (#295) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] Change the model for ReadableStream to have async read() (#296) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] Change the model for ReadableStream to have async read() (#296) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] Change the model for ReadableStream to have async read() (#296) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] Change the model for ReadableStream to have async read() (#296) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] Initial job, with hacks, that seems to work! Some algorithms converted! (7937dc0) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] Change the model for ReadableStream to have async read() (#296) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] Change the model for ReadableStream to have async read() (#296) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] What types does ReadableByteStream's reader's read(x) accept and return? (#295) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] What should we call ReadableByteStream.prototype.getBYOBReader()? (#294) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] Getting errored/closed reader, Auto-releasing reader, Forcible cancel() on a stream (#297) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] Getting errored/closed reader, Auto-releasing reader, Forcible cancel() on a stream (#297) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] What should we call ReadableByteStream.prototype.getBYOBReader()? (#294) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] What should we call ReadableByteStream.prototype.getBYOBReader()? (#294) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] Getting errored/closed reader, Auto-releasing reader, Forcible cancel() on a stream (#297) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] Getting errored/closed reader, Auto-releasing reader, Forcible cancel() on a stream (#297) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] Getting errored/closed reader, Auto-releasing reader, Forcible cancel() on a stream (#297) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] Getting errored/closed reader, Auto-releasing reader, Forcible cancel() on a stream (#297) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] Getting errored/closed reader, Auto-releasing reader, Forcible cancel() on a stream (#297) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] Getting errored/closed reader, Auto-releasing reader, Forcible cancel() on a stream (#297) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] getting and releasing reader (#297) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] getting and releasing reader (#297) (Friday, 13 March)
Re: [streams] getting and releasing reader (#297) (Friday, 13 March)
Re: [streams] getting and releasing reader (#297) (Friday, 13 March)
Re: [streams] What types does ReadableByteStream's reader's read(x) accept and return? (#295) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [streams] Is Node's "unshift" necessary? (#3) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [streams] Is Node's "unshift" necessary? (#3) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [streams] Ensure the JS thread doesn't have to get hit when piping two streams to each other (#97) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [streams] Should readable streams start right away? (#269) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [streams] Should readable streams start right away? (#269) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [streams] Do we need to pass enqueue and close as parameters to UnderlyingSource.pull? (#292) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [streams] Do we need to pass enqueue and close as parameters to UnderlyingSource.pull? (#292) (Thursday, 12 March)
[streams] Change the model for ReadableStream to have async read() (#296) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [streams] Change the model for ReadableStream to have async read() (#288) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [streams] Change the model for ReadableStream to have async read() (#288) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [streams] What types does ReadableByteStream's reader's read(x) accept and return? (#295) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [streams] What types does ReadableByteStream's reader's read(x) accept and return? (#295) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [streams] What should we call ReadableByteStream.prototype.getBYOBReader()? (#294) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [streams] Change the model for ReadableStream to have async read() (#288) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [streams] What should we call ReadableByteStream.prototype.getBYOBReader()? (#294) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [streams] What should we call ReadableByteStream.prototype.getBYOBReader()? (#294) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [streams] Do we need to pass enqueue and close as parameters to UnderlyingSource.pull? (#292) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [streams] Why is the reference implementation calling promise callbacks synchronously? (#293) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [streams] Maybe giving async readInto (and read?) another shot (#290) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [streams] Maybe giving async readInto (and read?) another shot (#290) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [streams] New proposal for byte stream uses cases (#289) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [streams] New proposal for byte stream uses cases (#289) (Wednesday, 11 March)
[streams] What types does ReadableByteStream's reader's read(x) accept and return? (#295) (Wednesday, 11 March)
[streams] What should we call ReadableByteStream.prototype.getBYOBReader()? (#294) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [streams] Why is the reference implementation calling promise callbacks synchronously? (#293) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [streams] Do we need to pass enqueue and close as parameters to UnderlyingSource.pull? (#292) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Tuesday, 10 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Tuesday, 10 March)
Re: [streams] Test ReadableStream does not call pull multiple times after previous pull finishes is incorrectly specified. (#291) (Tuesday, 10 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Monday, 9 March)
Re: [streams] Change the model for ReadableStream to have async read() (#288) (Monday, 9 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Monday, 9 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Monday, 9 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [streams] Change the model for ReadableStream to have async read() (#288) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [streams] Change the model for ReadableStream to have async read() (#288) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Wednesday, 4 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Wednesday, 4 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Tuesday, 3 March)
Re: [streams] Prototyping several changes for better support for reading bytes (#287) (Tuesday, 3 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Tuesday, 3 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Tuesday, 3 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Tuesday, 3 March)
Re: [streams] New proposal for byte stream uses cases (#289) (Monday, 2 March)
Re: [streams] New proposal for byte stream uses cases (#289) (Monday, 2 March)
Re: [webidl] Make the DOMException constructor accept a name (#22) (Monday, 2 March)

Dominique Hazael-Massieux

Re: [manifest] i18n: No localization model; [I18N-ISSUE-412] (#338) (Wednesday, 25 March)

Ehsan Akhgari

Re: [fetch] consider different default context value than "fetch" for new Request() (#29) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache should sanitize the stored Request in put/add/addAll (#664) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] consider different default context value than "fetch" for new Request() (#29) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache should sanitize the stored Request in put/add/addAll (#664) (Friday, 27 March)
[ServiceWorker] Remove ignoreMethod (#653) (Monday, 16 March)

Eric Lawless

Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 31 March)

Fernando Jiménez Moreno

[ServiceWorker] Remove "parsed" state mention (#663) (Thursday, 26 March)

Filippos Vasilakis

Re: [push-api] Any implementation ? (#119) (Monday, 9 March)
[push-api] Any implementation ? (#119) (Monday, 2 March)

flaki

Re: [ServiceWorker] https should not be mandatory (#658) (Saturday, 28 March)

Francisco Ryan Tolmasky I

Re: [ServiceWorker] Returning a FetchPromise from fetch() (#625) (Monday, 2 March)

Giovanni Ortuno

[manifest] Incorrect argument (#341) (Monday, 23 March)

Gray Zhang

Re: [ServiceWorker] Returning a FetchPromise from fetch() (#625) (Monday, 2 March)

Hawk

Re: [ServiceWorker] Equivalent of Shared Worker Port in Service Worker? (#662) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Equivalent of Shared Worker Port in Service Worker? (#662) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Equivalent of Shared Worker Port in Service Worker? (#662) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Equivalent of Shared Worker Port in Service Worker? (#662) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Equivalent of Shared Worker Port in Service Worker? (#662) (Tuesday, 24 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Equivalent of Shared Worker Port in Service Worker? (#662) (Tuesday, 24 March)
[ServiceWorker] Equivalent of Shared Worker Port in Service Worker? (#662) (Tuesday, 24 March)
[ServiceWorker] Service Worker constructor instead of navigator.serviceWorker (#660) (Tuesday, 24 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] https should not be mandatory (#658) (Monday, 23 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] https should not be mandatory (#658) (Monday, 23 March)
[ServiceWorker] https should not be mandatory (#658) (Monday, 23 March)

Hayato Ito

Re: [webcomponents] Link to CSS Scoping module spec? (#37) (Monday, 9 March)
Re: [webcomponents] add autolinking as a preprocessor (#36) (Tuesday, 3 March)
Re: [webcomponents] add autolinking as a preprocessor (#36) (Tuesday, 3 March)

hiroshige-g

[fetch] URLs with username/password (#26) (Thursday, 26 March)

Ilya Grigorik

Re: [ServiceWorker] Prefetch/prerender & Client id (#210) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Prefetch/prerender & Client id (#210) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Prefetch/prerender & Client id (#210) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Prefetch/prerender & Client id (#210) (Friday, 13 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] SW spec should expose Resource Timing and User Timing (#553) (Tuesday, 10 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] SW spec should expose Resource Timing and User Timing (#553) (Tuesday, 10 March)

Jake Archibald

Re: [ServiceWorker] Response streaming and SW lifetime (#651) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Response streaming and SW lifetime (#651) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Response streaming and SW lifetime (#651) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] HEAD request on Cache API should not return response with body (#655) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] HEAD request on Cache API should not return response with body (#655) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] HEAD request on Cache API should not return response with body (#655) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] HEAD request on Cache API should not return response with body (#655) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] HEAD request on Cache API should not return response with body (#655) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] HEAD request on Cache API should not return response with body (#655) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] HEAD request on Cache API should not return response with body (#655) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Event queuing model for SW (#649) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] HEAD request on Cache API should not return response with body (#655) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] should Cache support VARY:*,otherheader or only VARY:* (#656) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] should Cache support VARY:*,otherheader or only VARY:* (#656) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] should Cache support VARY:*,otherheader or only VARY:* (#656) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [push-api] Push events should Soft Update service worker (#115) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Do we need InstallEvent's activeWorker? (#661) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Not Found Error instead of undefined response (#666) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Not Found Error instead of undefined response (#666) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Deprecate fetch (#28) (Saturday, 28 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Saturday, 28 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [fetch] Prevent modifying headers on Responses (#24) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker constructor instead of navigator.serviceWorker (#660) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker constructor instead of navigator.serviceWorker (#660) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Do we need InstallEvent's activeWorker? (#661) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Equivalent of Shared Worker Port in Service Worker? (#662) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Equivalent of Shared Worker Port in Service Worker? (#662) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Cancelling HTTP fetch (#592) (Tuesday, 24 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Cancelling HTTP fetch (#592) (Tuesday, 24 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Equivalent of Shared Worker Port in Service Worker? (#662) (Tuesday, 24 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Cancelling HTTP fetch (#592) (Tuesday, 24 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Cancelling HTTP fetch (#592) (Tuesday, 24 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659) (Tuesday, 24 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Equivalent of Shared Worker Port in Service Worker? (#662) (Tuesday, 24 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Equivalent of Shared Worker Port in Service Worker? (#662) (Tuesday, 24 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] https should not be mandatory (#658) (Monday, 23 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] https should not be mandatory (#658) (Monday, 23 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] https should not be mandatory (#658) (Monday, 23 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Allowing multiple scopes (& should scopes be primary key?) (#566) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Allowing multiple scopes (& should scopes be primary key?) (#566) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Allowing multiple scopes (& should scopes be primary key?) (#566) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Allowing multiple scopes (& should scopes be primary key?) (#566) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] object/embed (#249) (Thursday, 12 March)

Janusz Majnert

Re: [manifest] Add requirements when the Manifest is used by crawlers (#343) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [manifest] typo found (#342) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [manifest] typo found (#342) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [manifest] typo found (#342) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [manifest] Are "hosted apps" in scope? (#340) (Tuesday, 24 March)
Re: [manifest] Incorrect argument (#341) (Tuesday, 24 March)
Re: [manifest] Are "hosted apps" in scope? (#340) (Tuesday, 24 March)
Re: [manifest] Are "hosted apps" in scope? (#340) (Tuesday, 24 March)
Re: [manifest] Resolve start_url against manifest URL (#330) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [manifest] Resolve start_url against manifest URL (#330) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [manifest] Defined identity based on manifest URL (closes #272) (853182c) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [manifest] Resolve start_url against manifest URL (#330) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Friday, 13 March)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Friday, 13 March)
Re: [manifest] Defined identiy based on manifest URL (closes #272) (27cdbb5) (Friday, 13 March)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Friday, 13 March)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [packaged-webapps] NoInterfaceObject missing or in wrong path (#1) (Monday, 2 March)
Re: [packaged-webapps] NoInterfaceObject missing or in wrong path (#1) (Monday, 2 March)

Jeffrey Yasskin

Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Saturday, 28 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Saturday, 28 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] SW spec never hooks into the "runs a worker" term that the CSP spec uses to enforce CSPs (#378) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [permissions] Is `Permissions.get` the right name? (#5) (Thursday, 5 March)

jhusain

Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 26 March)

Joe Medley

Re: [fetch] Prevent modifying headers on Responses (#24) (Friday, 13 March)

John Mellor

Re: [push-api] Allow UAs to unsubscribe offline "successfully" (#122) (Friday, 6 March)
[push-api] Allow UAs to unsubscribe offline "successfully" (#122) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [push-api] How to handle service worker unregister? (#121) (Wednesday, 4 March)
Re: [push-api] Push API should recommend implementing ServiceWorkerRegistration.showNotification (#118) (Monday, 2 March)
Re: [push-api] Push API should recommend implementing ServiceWorkerRegistration.showNotification (#118) (Monday, 2 March)
[push-api] Push API should recommend implementing ServiceWorkerRegistration.showNotification (#118) (Monday, 2 March)

John Reilly

Re: [ServiceWorker] service-worker.d.ts.... (#576) (Thursday, 26 March)

Jonas Sicking

Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Sunday, 29 March)
Re: [streams] can streams be transferred via postMessage()? (#276) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [fetch] Distinguishing between errors (#25) (Friday, 20 March)

Joshua Bell

Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient can't be a MessageEvent.source because it's not a WindowProxy or MessagePort (#453) (Wednesday, 11 March)
[ServiceWorker] Should UUID for unique IDs be mandated? (#647) (Monday, 9 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] openWindow(url)'s same origin check should be done against the origin of the final response's url? (#646) (Monday, 9 March)

Jungkee Song

Re: [ServiceWorker] Serialize the steps of Update/Install/Activate algorithms instead of running them 'atomically' in parallel. (240054c) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Do we need InstallEvent's activeWorker? (#661) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Do we need InstallEvent's activeWorker? (#661) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Resources shared across documents controlled by different service workers (#244) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Remove "parsed" state mention (#663) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Remove "parsed" state mention (#663) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Do we need InstallEvent's activeWorker? (#661) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Do we need InstallEvent's activeWorker? (#661) (Tuesday, 24 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659) (Tuesday, 24 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] "conforming to ECMAScript 6 Map objects"? (#491) (Monday, 23 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] How do I get from a script to a service worker registration (#504) (Monday, 23 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] How do I get from a script to a service worker registration (#504) (Monday, 23 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Resources shared across documents controlled by different service workers (#244) (Monday, 23 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Resources shared across documents controlled by different service workers (#244) (Monday, 23 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Association between a service worker and global objects (#652) (Monday, 23 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Association between a service worker and global objects (#652) (Monday, 23 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Association between a service worker and global objects (#652) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Define environment settings object for service workers (#526) (Friday, 13 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Define environment settings object for service workers (#526) (Friday, 13 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Event queuing model for SW (#649) (Friday, 13 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] object/embed (#249) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] object/embed (#249) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] How to set the client for the requests initiated from within user agent's internal context? (#615) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient can't be a MessageEvent.source because it's not a WindowProxy or MessagePort (#453) (Thursday, 12 March)
[ServiceWorker] Event queuing model for SW (#649) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] object/embed (#249) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] object/embed (#249) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] navigator.serviceWorker.postMessage should populate messageEvent.source & ports (#290) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] navigator.serviceWorker.postMessage should populate messageEvent.source & ports (#290) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] SW spec never hooks into the "runs a worker" term that the CSP spec uses to enforce CSPs (#378) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker inherits from Worker (#410) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker inherits from Worker (#410) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient can't be a MessageEvent.source because it's not a WindowProxy or MessagePort (#453) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerClient can't be a MessageEvent.source because it's not a WindowProxy or MessagePort (#453) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Relationship to Caches & ScriptCache in ServiceWorkerGlobalScope (#473) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Relationship to Caches & ScriptCache in ServiceWorkerGlobalScope (#473) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker's postMessage method is not defined (#479) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker's postMessage method is not defined (#479) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] "messaging occurs as per usual with Web Workers" (#484) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] "messaging occurs as per usual with Web Workers" (#484) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Define environment settings object for service workers (#526) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Drop client from fetchEvent/request? (#575) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Add an API to take over uncontrolled pages (or pages controlled by another service worker) (#586) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Add an API to take over uncontrolled pages (or pages controlled by another service worker) (#586) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] FetchEvent not defined (#645) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] FetchEvent not defined (#645) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] [[UpdateState]] does not define event loop (#481) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] [[UpdateState]] does not define event loop (#481) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] How to set the client for the requests initiated from within user agent's internal context? (#615) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] How to set the client for the requests initiated from within user agent's internal context? (#615) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Should UUID for unique IDs be mandated? (#647) (Tuesday, 10 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] openWindow(url)'s same origin check should be done against the origin of the final response's url? (#646) (Tuesday, 10 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] openWindow(url)'s same origin check should be done against the origin of the final response's url? (#646) (Monday, 9 March)
[ServiceWorker] openWindow(url)'s same origin check should be done against the origin of the final response's url? (#646) (Monday, 9 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] FetchEvent not defined (#645) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Clients & postMessage (#609) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker objects should have an .id (#635) (Monday, 2 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] client objects should have an .id (#634) (Monday, 2 March)

Kenji Baheux

Re: [permissions] Should 'prompt' be renamed as 'default'? (#12) (Thursday, 26 March)
[ServiceWorker] Do we need InstallEvent's activeWorker? (#661) (Tuesday, 24 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker objects should have an .id (#635) (Tuesday, 24 March)
Re: [permissions] Should 'prompt' be renamed as 'default'? (#12) (Wednesday, 18 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Prefetch/prerender & Client id (#210) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Prefetch/prerender & Client id (#210) (Friday, 13 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] How to set the client for the requests initiated from within user agent's internal context? (#615) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Optimization opportunity for SW (Should sync/push event target a specific server?) (#644) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Should sync event target a specific server? (#644) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Should sync event target a specific server? (#644) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Should sync event target a specific server? (#644) (Thursday, 5 March)
[ServiceWorker] Should sync event target a specific server? (#644) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Should sync event target a specific server? (#644) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Should sync event target a specific server? (#644) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Should sync event target a specific server? (#644) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Should sync event target a specific server? (#644) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Should sync event target a specific server? (#644) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Should sync event target a specific server? (#644) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Why would `WindowClient` ever have `frameType` of `none`? (#632) (Wednesday, 4 March)

Kenneth Rohde Christiansen

Re: [manifest] Are "hosted apps" in scope? (#340) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [manifest] Add requirements when the Manifest is used by crawlers (#343) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [manifest] A way to link to related applications (#326) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [manifest] A way to link to related applications (#326) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [manifest] Are "hosted apps" in scope? (#340) (Tuesday, 24 March)
Re: [manifest] Are "hosted apps" in scope? (#340) (Tuesday, 24 March)
Re: [manifest] A way to link to related applications (#326) (Tuesday, 24 March)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [manifest] shouldn't the default scope be bounded? (#332) (Friday, 20 March)
[manifest] i18n: No localization model (#338) (Friday, 20 March)
[manifest] i18n: No localized examples (#337) (Friday, 20 March)
[manifest] i18n: No means of obtaining correctly localized manifest (#336) (Friday, 20 March)
[manifest] i18n: No language metadata for 'name' (#335) (Friday, 20 March)
[manifest] No direction metadata for 'name' (#334) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [manifest] Resolve start_url against manifest URL (#330) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Wednesday, 18 March)
Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Wednesday, 18 March)
Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Wednesday, 18 March)
Re: [manifest] Resolve start_url against manifest URL (#330) (Wednesday, 18 March)
Re: [manifest] Resolve start_url against manifest URL (#330) (Wednesday, 18 March)
Re: [manifest] Resolve start_url against manifest URL (#330) (Wednesday, 18 March)
Re: [manifest] Clarified opening deep link (closes #301) (#302) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [manifest] Resolve start_url against manifest URL (#330) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [manifest] Move to using Echidna (#315) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [manifest] Resolve start_url against manifest URL (#330) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [manifest] Add note about i18n (#323) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [manifest] shouldn't the default scope be bounded? (#332) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [manifest] Defined identiy based on manifest URL (closes #272) (#329) (Monday, 16 March)
[manifest] shouldn't the default scope be bounded? (#332) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Monday, 9 March)
Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Monday, 9 March)
Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Monday, 9 March)
Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Monday, 9 March)
Re: [manifest] Convert "Icon object" into a generic "image object" (#327) (Saturday, 7 March)
Re: [manifest] Native API Permissions (#319) (Saturday, 7 March)
Re: [manifest] Add theme_color member (closes #225) (c74ab60) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [manifest] A way to link to related applications (#326) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [manifest] Native API Permissions (#319) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [manifest] Native API Permissions (#319) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [manifest] Native API Permissions (#319) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [manifest] Convert "Icon object" into a generic "image object" (#327) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [manifest] A way to link to related applications (#326) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [manifest] Added lang member (closes #322) (cbd8343) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [manifest] Convert "Icon object" into a generic "image object" (#327) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [manifest] Fixed scopeURL typo (closes #320) (cddb540) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [manifest] Added lang member (closes #322) (cbd8343) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [manifest] Added lang member (closes #322) (cbd8343) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [manifest] Native API Permissions (#319) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [manifest] clarify display-mode and UAs and iframes (closes #309) (b517aef) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [manifest] clarify display-mode and UAs and iframes (closes #309) (b517aef) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [manifest] Convert "Icon object" into a generic "image object" (#327) (Friday, 6 March)

Kinuko Yasuda

Re: [ServiceWorker] client objects should have an .id (#634) (Friday, 6 March)

Kyle Simpson

Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 26 March)

Lennie

Re: [packaging-on-the-web] Security use cases for packaging (#21) (Tuesday, 3 March)

Lewis Phạm

Re: [ServiceWorker] Service Worker doesn't catch favicon requests (#668) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Service Worker doesn (#667) (Tuesday, 31 March)
[ServiceWorker] Service Worker doesn't catch favicon requests (#668) (Tuesday, 31 March)
[ServiceWorker] Service Worker doesn (#667) (Tuesday, 31 March)
[ServiceWorker] Not Found Error instead of undefined response (#666) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Equivalent of Shared Worker Port in Service Worker? (#662) (Saturday, 28 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Equivalent of Shared Worker Port in Service Worker? (#662) (Saturday, 28 March)

Marcos Caceres

Re: [manifest] difference between lang and default_locale (#345) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [manifest] difference between lang and default_locale (#345) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [manifest] difference between lang and default_locale (#345) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [permissions] Permission states (#3) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [permissions] Permission states (#3) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [permissions] Version of the API that should be simple, extensible and ready for MVP. (#20) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [permissions] Version of the API that should be simple, extensible and ready for MVP. (#20) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [permissions] Version of the API that should be simple, extensible and ready for MVP. (#20) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [permissions] Version of the API that should be simple, extensible and ready for MVP. (#20) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [permissions] Version of the API that should be simple, extensible and ready for MVP. (#20) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [permissions] Version of the API that should be simple, extensible and ready for MVP. (#20) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [permissions] Version of the API that should be simple, extensible and ready for MVP. (#20) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [permissions] Version of the API that should be simple, extensible and ready for MVP. (#20) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [manifest] The use of the `.manifest` file extension may be problematic / confusing ? (#346) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [manifest] A way to link to related applications (#326) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [permissions] Have an instance of Permissions on Navigator and WorkerNavigator. (#18) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [permissions] Have an instance of Permissions on Navigator and WorkerNavigator. (#18) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [permissions] Have an instance of Permissions on Navigator and WorkerNavigator. (#18) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [permissions] A "dismissed" state (#4) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [permissions] Have an instance of Permissions on Navigator and WorkerNavigator. (#18) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [permissions] Have an instance of Permissions on Navigator and WorkerNavigator. (#18) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [permissions] Have an instance of Permissions on Navigator and WorkerNavigator. (#18) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [manifest] i18n: No language metadata for 'name'; [I18N-ISSUE-415] (#335) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [manifest] i18n: No means of obtaining correctly localized manifest; [I18N-ISSUE-414] (#336) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [manifest] Add requirements when the Manifest is used by crawlers (#343) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [manifest] Incorrect argument (#341) (Tuesday, 24 March)
Re: [manifest] Incorrect argument (#341) (Tuesday, 24 March)
Re: [manifest] Incorrect argument (#341) (Tuesday, 24 March)
Re: [manifest] Graceful handling of no network connectivity in hosted apps (#339) (Monday, 23 March)
[manifest] Are "hosted apps" in scope? (#340) (Monday, 23 March)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Monday, 23 March)
Re: [manifest] Graceful handling of no network connectivity in hosted apps (#339) (Monday, 23 March)
Re: [manifest] Graceful handling of no network connectivity in hosted apps (#339) (Monday, 23 March)
Re: [manifest] Graceful handling of no network connectivity in hosted apps (#339) (Monday, 23 March)
Re: [manifest] Graceful handling of no network connectivity in hosted apps (#339) (Monday, 23 March)
Re: [manifest] i18n: No localization model (#338) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [manifest] i18n: No localized examples (#337) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [manifest] Integration with service workers (#161) (Wednesday, 18 March)
Re: [manifest] A way to link to related applications (#326) (Wednesday, 18 March)
Re: [manifest] Move to using Echidna (#315) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [manifest] Clarified opening deep link (closes #301) (#302) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [manifest] Echidna (#333) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [manifest] Echidna (#333) (Tuesday, 17 March)
[manifest] Echidna (#333) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [manifest] Defined identity based on manifest URL (closes #272) (#329) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [manifest] Move to using Echidna (#315) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [manifest] Add note about i18n (#323) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [manifest] Defined identity based on manifest URL (closes #272) (#329) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [manifest] Defined identity based on manifest URL (closes #272) (#329) (Monday, 16 March)
[spec-reviews] Fixed typos (#46) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [manifest] Defined identiy based on manifest URL (closes #272) (#329) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [manifest] Defined identiy based on manifest URL (closes #272) (27cdbb5) (Friday, 13 March)
[manifest] For `lang`, add formal defintion of language tag (#331) (Friday, 13 March)
Re: [manifest] Resolve start_url against manifest URL (#330) (Friday, 13 March)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Friday, 13 March)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Friday, 13 March)
Re: [manifest] add a license field (#328) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [manifest] Native API Permissions (#319) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [manifest] Native API Permissions (#319) (Thursday, 12 March)
[manifest] Defined identiy based on manifest URL (closes #272) (#329) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [manifest] add a license field (#328) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [manifest] add a license field (#328) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [manifest] A way to link to related applications (#326) (Wednesday, 11 March)
[push-api] Removed NoInterfaceObject from PushMessageData (closes #123) (#124) (Wednesday, 11 March)
[push-api] Remove [NoInterfaceObject] from PushMessageData (#123) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [manifest] Integration with service workers (#161) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [manifest] Integration with service workers (#161) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [manifest] Integration with service workers (#161) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [manifest] Native API Permissions (#319) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [manifest] add a license field (#328) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [manifest] Add a lang member (#322) (Tuesday, 10 March)
Re: [manifest] Added lang member (closes #322) (#324) (Tuesday, 10 March)
Re: [manifest] Add a lang member (#322) (Tuesday, 10 March)
Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Tuesday, 10 March)
Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Monday, 9 March)
Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Monday, 9 March)
Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Monday, 9 March)
Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Monday, 9 March)
Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Monday, 9 March)
Re: [manifest] Convert "Icon object" into a generic "image object" (#327) (Sunday, 8 March)
Re: [manifest] A means to control the "theme color" (#225) (Sunday, 8 March)
Re: [manifest] A way to link to related applications (#326) (Saturday, 7 March)
Re: [manifest] A means to control the "theme color" (#225) (Saturday, 7 March)
Re: [manifest] Add theme_color member (closes #225) (#325) (Saturday, 7 March)
Re: [manifest] Clarify display-mode relationship to iframes and legacy content (#309) (Saturday, 7 March)
Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Saturday, 7 March)
Re: [manifest] clarify display-mode and UAs and iframes (closes #309) (#318) (Saturday, 7 March)
Re: [manifest] Add theme_color member (closes #225) (#325) (Saturday, 7 March)
Re: [manifest] A way to link to related applications (#326) (Saturday, 7 March)
Re: [manifest] Native API Permissions (#319) (Saturday, 7 March)
Re: [manifest] Convert "Icon object" into a generic "image object" (#327) (Saturday, 7 March)
Re: [manifest] A way to link to related applications (#326) (Saturday, 7 March)
Re: [manifest] Add a lang member (#322) (Saturday, 7 March)
Re: [permissions] Could we ask for several permissions at a time ? (#6) (Saturday, 7 March)
Re: [manifest] clarify display-mode and UAs and iframes (closes #309) (b517aef) (Saturday, 7 March)
Re: [permissions] A "dismissed" state (#4) (Saturday, 7 March)
Re: [manifest] Convert "Icon object" into a generic "image object" (#327) (Saturday, 7 March)
Re: [manifest] Convert "Icon object" into a generic "image object" (#327) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [manifest] A way to link to related applications (#326) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [manifest] Native API Permissions (#319) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [manifest] Add a lang member (#322) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [manifest] Added lang member (closes #322) (cbd8343) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [manifest] Convert "Icon object" into a generic "image object" (#327) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [manifest] Convert "Icon object" into a generic "image object" (#327) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [manifest] Added lang member (closes #322) (cbd8343) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [manifest] Clarify "scope" in step #3 of Section 3 (#320) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [manifest] Fixed scopeURL typo (closes #320) (#321) (Friday, 6 March)
[manifest] Convert "Icon object" into a generic "image object" (#327) (Friday, 6 March)
[manifest] A way to link to related applications (#326) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [manifest] i18n - RTL/LTR issues (#10) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [manifest] i18n - RTL/LTR issues (#10) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [manifest] Add recommended width and height (#310) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [manifest] Add recommended width and height (#310) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [manifest] clarify display-mode and UAs and iframes (closes #309) (#318) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [permissions] Could we ask for several permissions at a time ? (#6) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [permissions] Renamed .get to .check (closes #5) (#7) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [permissions] Renamed .get to .check (closes #5) (#7) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [manifest] Native API Permissions (#319) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [manifest] Add note about i18n (#323) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [manifest] Native API Permissions (#319) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [manifest] Fixed scopeURL typo (closes #320) (cddb540) (Thursday, 5 March)
[manifest] Add theme_color member (closes #225) (#325) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [manifest] Add a lang member (#322) (Thursday, 5 March)
[manifest] Added lang member (closes #322) (#324) (Wednesday, 4 March)
[manifest] Add note about i18n (#323) (Wednesday, 4 March)
Re: [manifest] Native API Permissions (#319) (Wednesday, 4 March)
[manifest] Add a language tag (#322) (Wednesday, 4 March)
[manifest] Fixed scopeURL typo (closes #320) (#321) (Wednesday, 4 March)
Re: [manifest] Clarify "scope" in step #3 of Section 3 (#320) (Wednesday, 4 March)
[permissions] Renamed .get to .check (closes #5) (#7) (Tuesday, 3 March)
Re: [manifest] Native API Permissions (#319) (Tuesday, 3 March)
Re: [manifest] i18n - RTL/LTR issues (#10) (Monday, 2 March)

Marius Gundersen

Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Saturday, 28 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 26 March)

Mark Nottingham

Re: [ServiceWorker] should Cache support VARY:*,otherheader or only VARY:* (#656) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] should Cache support VARY:*,otherheader or only VARY:* (#656) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] should Cache support VARY:*,otherheader or only VARY:* (#656) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [spec-reviews] http-problem (#37) (Monday, 23 March)
Re: [spec-reviews] http-problem (#37) (Monday, 23 March)
Re: [spec-reviews] http-problem (#37) (Monday, 23 March)
Re: [spec-reviews] http-problem (#37) (Tuesday, 17 March)

Martin Thomson

Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [push-api] Straw man for encryption (#130) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Saturday, 28 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Saturday, 28 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Saturday, 28 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Saturday, 28 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [push-api] Push service definition (#128) (Wednesday, 25 March)
[push-api] Describe process for subscription updates (#132) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [push-api] Push service definition (#128) (Tuesday, 24 March)
Re: [push-api] Define a serializer for PushSubscription (#125) (Wednesday, 18 March)
[push-api] Straw man for encryption (#130) (Wednesday, 18 March)
Re: [push-api] Move to using just endpoint (#129) (Wednesday, 18 March)
[push-api] Move to using just endpoint (#129) (Tuesday, 17 March)
[push-api] Delete the 'master' branch please (#127) (Tuesday, 17 March)
[push-api] Push service definition (#128) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [push-api] Fixing definition of push message (#126) (Tuesday, 17 March)
[push-api] Fixing definition of push message (#126) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [push-api] Define a serializer for PushSubscription (#125) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [push-api] Allow UAs to unsubscribe offline "successfully" (#122) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [push-api] pushsubscriptionchange - Initial feedback (#120) (Wednesday, 4 March)

Matt Falkenhagen

Re: [ServiceWorker] Service Worker doesn't catch favicon requests (#668) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Equivalent of Shared Worker Port in Service Worker? (#662) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Equivalent of Shared Worker Port in Service Worker? (#662) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659) (Wednesday, 25 March)
[ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659) (Tuesday, 24 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] importScripts() should throw? (#642) (Friday, 6 March)

Matthew Gaunt

Re: [push-api] Allow UAs to unsubscribe offline "successfully" (#122) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [push-api] pushsubscriptionchange - Initial feedback (#120) (Wednesday, 4 March)
Re: [push-api] How to handle service worker unregister? (#121) (Wednesday, 4 March)
Re: [push-api] How to handle service worker unregister? (#121) (Wednesday, 4 March)
Re: [push-api] How to handle service worker unregister? (#121) (Wednesday, 4 March)
[push-api] How to handle service worker unregister? (#121) (Wednesday, 4 March)
[push-api] pushsubscriptionchange - Initial feedback (#120) (Wednesday, 4 March)

Michael van Ouwerkerk

Re: [permissions] Is `Permissions.get` the right name? (#5) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [push-api] How to handle service worker unregister? (#121) (Wednesday, 4 March)
Re: [push-api] Permission checks in the push API (#75) (Tuesday, 3 March)
Re: [push-api] Any implementation ? (#119) (Monday, 2 March)

millisecond

Re: [push-api] Permission checks in the push API (#75) (Tuesday, 3 March)

Mounir Lamouri

Re: [permissions] Specify how to behave when an extended Permission dictionary doesn't match requirements (#14) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [permissions] Specify how to behave when an extended Permission dictionary doesn't match requirements (#14) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [permissions] Fix typo around Promise.all (#21) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [permissions] Fix typo around Promise.all (#21) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [permissions] Version of the API that should be simple, extensible and ready for MVP. (#20) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [permissions] Version of the API that should be simple, extensible and ready for MVP. (#20) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [permissions] Version of the API that should be simple, extensible and ready for MVP. (#20) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [permissions] Version of the API that should be simple, extensible and ready for MVP. (#20) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [permissions] Version of the API that should be simple, extensible and ready for MVP. (#20) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [permissions] Version of the API that should be simple, extensible and ready for MVP. (#20) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [permissions] Version of the API that should be simple, extensible and ready for MVP. (#20) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [permissions] Version of the API that should be simple, extensible and ready for MVP. (#20) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [permissions] Version of the API that should be simple, extensible and ready for MVP. (#20) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [permissions] Version of the API that should be simple, extensible and ready for MVP. (#20) (Tuesday, 31 March)
[permissions] Version of the API that should be simple, extensible and ready for MVP. (#20) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [push-api] Add a PushSubscriptionOptions dictionary with a userVisible option. (#131) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [push-api] Add a PushSubscriptionOptions dictionary with a userVisible option. (#131) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [permissions] Should Permissions be an interface with static objects? (#11) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [permissions] Renamed .get to .check (closes #5) (#7) (Friday, 27 March)
[manifest] Add related_applications and prefer_related_applications. (#344) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [screen-orientation] Natural shouldn't be equivalent to *-secondary. Fixes #83 (#84) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [screen-orientation] The orientation type 'Natural' should only lock to x-primary (#83) (Thursday, 26 March)
[permissions] Add Promise.all() example for multiple queries (#19) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [permissions] Have an instance of Permissions on Navigator and WorkerNavigator. (#18) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [permissions] Have an instance of Permissions on Navigator and WorkerNavigator. (#18) (Wednesday, 25 March)
[manifest] Add requirements when the Manifest is used by crawlers (#343) (Wednesday, 25 March)
[permissions] Have an instance of Permissions on Navigator and WorkerNavigator. (#18) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [permissions] Should 'prompt' be renamed as 'default'? (#12) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [permissions] Should 'prompt' be renamed as 'default'? (#12) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [permissions] What should "retrieve the permission state" do for context related permissions? (#9) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [permissions] Permission states (#3) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [permissions] Redundant assertion (#2) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [permissions] Redundant assertion (#2) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [permissions] A "dismissed" state (#4) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [permissions] Should we add a global change event? (#15) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [permissions] Should we add a global change event? (#15) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [permissions] Is `Permissions.get` the right name? (#5) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [permissions] Is `Permissions.get` the right name? (#5) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [permissions] Exposition (Window,Worker) should be explicit (#16) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [permissions] Exposition (Window,Worker) should be explicit (#16) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [permissions] Should 'prompt' be renamed as 'default'? (#12) (Wednesday, 18 March)
Re: [manifest] A way to link to related applications (#326) (Wednesday, 18 March)
Re: [manifest] Integration with service workers (#161) (Wednesday, 18 March)
Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Wednesday, 18 March)
[permissions] Extensibility: make sure we have it right (#17) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [permissions] Exposition (Window,Worker) should be explicit (#16) (Tuesday, 17 March)
[permissions] Exposition (Window,Worker) should be explicit (#16) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [permissions] Should we add a global change event? (#15) (Tuesday, 17 March)
[permissions] Should we add a global change event? (#15) (Tuesday, 17 March)
[permissions] Specify how to behave when an extended Permission dictionary doesn't match requirements (#14) (Tuesday, 17 March)
[permissions] Should we have a more explicit enumerating process? (#13) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [permissions] Should 'prompt' be renamed as 'default'? (#12) (Tuesday, 17 March)
[permissions] Should 'prompt' be renamed as 'default'? (#12) (Tuesday, 17 March)
[permissions] Should Permissions be an interface with static objects? (#11) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [push-api] Removed NoInterfaceObject from PushMessageData (closes #123) (#124) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [push-api] Remove [NoInterfaceObject] from PushMessageData (#123) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [manifest] A means to control the "theme color" (#225) (Monday, 9 March)
Re: [manifest] A means to control the "theme color" (#225) (Monday, 9 March)
[permissions] Add getUserMedia permissions (#10) (Sunday, 8 March)
Re: [manifest] Add a lang member (#322) (Saturday, 7 March)
Re: [manifest] A means to control the "theme color" (#225) (Saturday, 7 March)
Re: [manifest] A means to control the "theme color" (#225) (Saturday, 7 March)
Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Saturday, 7 March)
Re: [manifest] A way to link to related applications (#326) (Saturday, 7 March)
Re: [permissions] A "dismissed" state (#4) (Saturday, 7 March)
Re: [permissions] Could we ask for several permissions at a time ? (#6) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [permissions] Is `Permissions.get` the right name? (#5) (Thursday, 5 March)
[permissions] What should "retrieve the permission state" do for context related permissinos? (#9) (Thursday, 5 March)
[permissions] What should "retrieve the permission state" do for pickers? (#8) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [permissions] Could we ask for several permissions at a time ? (#6) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [permissions] Could we ask for several permissions at a time ? (#6) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [permissions] A "dismissed" state (#4) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [permissions] Could we ask for several permissions at a time ? (#6) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [permissions] Is `Permissions.get` the right name? (#5) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [permissions] Renamed .get to .check (closes #5) (#7) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [manifest] Add note about i18n (#323) (Wednesday, 4 March)
Re: [manifest] Add a lang member (#322) (Wednesday, 4 March)

Nikhil Marathe

Re: [push-api] Nit: Any -> any (#133) (Wednesday, 25 March)
[push-api] Nit: Any -> any (#133) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [fetch] Operate on internal response (#23) (Monday, 16 March)
[fetch] Prevent modifying headers on Responses (#24) (Friday, 13 March)

Olivier

Re: [manifest] Native API Permissions (#319) (Friday, 6 March)

Owen Campbell-Moore

Re: [push-api] Define a serializer for PushSubscription (#125) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [manifest] A way to link to related applications (#326) (Monday, 23 March)

Patrick H. Lauke

Re: [touch-events] TouchEvent should have a constructor (#10) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [touch-events] TouchEvent should have a constructor (#10) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [touch-events] Note about PFWG's non-normative event mapping document (#4) (Tuesday, 3 March)

patrick kettner

Re: [ServiceWorker] object/embed (#249) (Friday, 27 March)

Paul Kinlan

Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [manifest] shouldn't the default scope be bounded? (#332) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [manifest] shouldn't the default scope be bounded? (#332) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [manifest] Resolve start_url against manifest URL (#330) (Friday, 20 March)

Peter Beverloo

Re: [push-api] Add a PushSubscriptionOptions dictionary with a userVisible option. (#131) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [push-api] Add a PushSubscriptionOptions dictionary with a userVisible option. (#131) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [push-api] Push service definition (#128) (Saturday, 28 March)
Re: [push-api] Straw man for encryption (#130) (Saturday, 28 March)
Re: [push-api] Add a PushSubscriptionOptions dictionary with a userVisible option. (#131) (Saturday, 28 March)
Re: [push-api] Move to using just endpoint (#129) (Tuesday, 24 March)
Re: [push-api] Add a PushSubscriptionOptions dictionary with a userVisible option. (#131) (Tuesday, 24 March)
[push-api] Add a PushSubscriptionOptions dictionary with a userVisible option. (#131) (Tuesday, 24 March)
Re: [push-api] Push service definition (#128) (Monday, 23 March)
Re: [push-api] Define a serializer for PushSubscription (#125) (Wednesday, 18 March)
Re: [push-api] Fixing definition of push message (#126) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [push-api] Define a serializer for PushSubscription (#125) (Tuesday, 17 March)
[push-api] Define a serializer for PushSubscription (#125) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [push-api] Remove [NoInterfaceObject] from PushMessageData (#123) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [push-api] Push API should recommend implementing ServiceWorkerRegistration.showNotification (#118) (Monday, 2 March)

Philip Jägenstedt

Re: [fullscreen] Add transform:none to the UA style sheet (#1) (Tuesday, 17 March)
[fullscreen] Add transform:none to the UA style sheet (#1) (Tuesday, 17 March)
[touch-events] Define the ontouch* event handler attributes (#11) (Friday, 6 March)

Piotr Kowalski

[gamepad] Specification (#1) (Tuesday, 17 March)

Quentin

Re: [permissions] Could we ask for several permissions at a time ? (#6) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [permissions] Could we ask for several permissions at a time ? (#6) (Thursday, 5 March)

Rahul Ravikumar

[manifest] Support for Actionable Notifications in the manifest (#347) (Tuesday, 31 March)

rektide

Re: [push-api] Consider exposing meta-information on push message (#81) (Wednesday, 18 March)

Rick Byers

[touch-events] Touch Event Extensions note should add arguments to CreateTouch (#12) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [touch-events] TouchEvent should have a constructor (#10) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [touch-events] TouchEvent should have a constructor (#10) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [touch-events] TouchEvent should have a constructor (#10) (Friday, 6 March)
[touch-events] TouchEvent should have a constructor (#10) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [touch-events] Note about PFWG's non-normative event mapping document (#4) (Tuesday, 3 March)
Re: [touch-events] Note about PFWG's non-normative event mapping document (#4) (Tuesday, 3 March)
Re: [touch-events] Setup IRC hook for commits (#1) (Tuesday, 3 March)
Re: [touch-events] Setup IRC hook for commits (#1) (Tuesday, 3 March)

Robin Berjon

[webcomponents] add autolinking as a preprocessor (#36) (Tuesday, 3 March)

Roger Meier

Re: [manifest] add a license field (#328) (Thursday, 12 March)
[manifest] add a license field (#328) (Wednesday, 11 March)

Sebastian Kippe

Re: [manifest] Add related_applications and prefer_related_applications. (#344) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [manifest] Graceful handling of no network connectivity in hosted apps (#339) (Monday, 23 March)
Re: [manifest] Are "hosted apps" in scope? (#340) (Monday, 23 March)
Re: [manifest] Graceful handling of no network connectivity in hosted apps (#339) (Monday, 23 March)
Re: [manifest] Graceful handling of no network connectivity in hosted apps (#339) (Monday, 23 March)
Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Wednesday, 18 March)
Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Wednesday, 18 March)

Sergey Konstantinov

Re: [spec-reviews] Update CSS Regions.md (#48) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [spec-reviews] Update CSS Regions.md (#48) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [spec-reviews] Update CSS Regions.md (#48) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [spec-reviews] Update CSS Regions.md (#48) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [spec-reviews] permissions API (#45) (Friday, 20 March)

sole

[webcomponents] Link to CSS Scoping module spec? (#37) (Thursday, 5 March)

Tab Atkins Jr.

Re: [ServiceWorker] Cancelling HTTP fetch (#592) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Returning a FetchPromise from fetch() (#625) (Monday, 2 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Returning a FetchPromise from fetch() (#625) (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Returning a FetchPromise from fetch() (#625) (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Returning a FetchPromise from fetch() (#625) (Sunday, 1 March)

Takeshi Yoshino

Re: [streams] Introduce readable stream controller class (#310) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [streams] Introduce readable stream controller class (#310) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [streams] Introduce readable stream controller class (#310) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308) (Tuesday, 31 March)
Re: [streams] consider allowing a stream to be removed from a pipeline (#307) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [streams] consider allowing a stream to be removed from a pipeline (#307) (Friday, 27 March)
Re: [streams] can streams be transferred via postMessage()? (#276) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [streams] can streams be transferred via postMessage()? (#276) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [streams] can streams be transferred via postMessage()? (#276) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [streams] Byte streams tracking bug (#300) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [streams] Defined behavior of each method on ByobByteStreamReader without detailed algorithm (5056a21) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [streams] Defined behavior of each method on ByobByteStreamReader without detailed algorithm (5056a21) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [streams] Defined behavior of each method on ByobByteStreamReader without detailed algorithm (5056a21) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [streams] Defined behavior of each method on ByobByteStreamReader without detailed algorithm (5056a21) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [streams] Defined behavior of each method on ByobByteStreamReader without detailed algorithm (5056a21) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [streams] Defined behavior of each method on ByobByteStreamReader without detailed algorithm (5056a21) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [streams] Defined behavior of each method on ByobByteStreamReader without detailed algorithm (5056a21) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [streams] Byte streams tracking bug (#300) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [streams] Byte streams tracking bug (#300) (Tuesday, 24 March)
Re: [streams] Generalized and precise flow/buffer control (#301) (Monday, 23 March)
Re: [streams] Byte streams: write up design rationales and vision for how they are used/what they enable (#177) (Monday, 23 March)
Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302) (Monday, 23 March)
Re: [streams] Byte streams: write up design rationales and vision for how they are used/what they enable (#177) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [streams] Throw on underlying source double-close or double-error (#303) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [streams] What types does ReadableByteStream's reader's read(x) accept and return? (#295) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [streams] What types does ReadableByteStream's reader's read(x) accept and return? (#295) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Cancelling HTTP fetch (#592) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [streams] Define "tee"ing a stream (#271) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [streams] Generalized and precise flow/buffer control (#301) (Wednesday, 18 March)
Re: [streams] Generalized and precise flow/buffer control (#301) (Wednesday, 18 March)
[streams] Generalized and precise flow/buffer control (#301) (Wednesday, 18 March)
Re: [streams] ReadableByteStreams: missing APIs (#176) (Tuesday, 17 March)
[streams] Byte streams (#300) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [streams] Do we need error-after-drain functionality? (#172) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [streams] Warning misbehaving underlying sources (#298) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [streams] Requirement on promises equality (#266) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [streams] Warning misbehaving underlying sources (#298) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [streams] Warning misbehaving underlying sources (#298) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [streams] Add BufferFeedableReadableByteStream (#282) (Tuesday, 17 March)
[streams] Add some more texts to Requirements.md about byte streams (#299) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Cancelling HTTP fetch (#592) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [streams] Initial job, with hacks, that seems to work! Some algorithms converted! (7937dc0) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] Change the model for ReadableStream to have async read() (#296) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] What types does ReadableByteStream's reader's read(x) accept and return? (#295) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] Change the model for ReadableStream to have async read() (#296) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] Change the model for ReadableStream to have async read() (#296) (Monday, 16 March)
[streams] Warning misbehaving underlying sources (#298) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] Change the model for ReadableStream to have async read() (#296) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] Change the model for ReadableStream to have async read() (#296) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] Change the model for ReadableStream to have async read() (#296) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] What should we call ReadableByteStream.prototype.getBYOBReader()? (#294) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] Add readableAmount getter to ReadableByteStream (#279) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] Add readableAmount getter to ReadableByteStream (#279) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] Getting errored/closed reader, Auto-releasing reader, Forcible cancel() on a stream (#297) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] What should we call ReadableByteStream.prototype.getBYOBReader()? (#294) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] Add readableAmount getter to ReadableByteStream (#279) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Cancelling HTTP fetch (#592) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] Getting errored/closed reader, Auto-releasing reader, Forcible cancel() on a stream (#297) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] Getting errored/closed reader, Auto-releasing reader, Forcible cancel() on a stream (#297) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] Getting errored/closed reader, Auto-releasing reader, Forcible cancel() on a stream (#297) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] Getting errored/closed reader, Auto-releasing reader, Forcible cancel() on a stream (#297) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] Getting errored/closed reader, Auto-releasing reader, Forcible cancel() on a stream (#297) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] Getting errored/closed reader, Auto-releasing reader, Forcible cancel() on a stream (#297) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] Getting errored/closed reader, Auto-releasing reader, Forcible cancel() on a stream (#297) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] getting and releasing reader (#297) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] What types does ReadableByteStream's reader's read(x) accept and return? (#295) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [streams] What types does ReadableByteStream's reader's read(x) accept and return? (#295) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [streams] What types does ReadableByteStream's reader's read(x) accept and return? (#295) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [streams] What types does ReadableByteStream's reader's read(x) accept and return? (#295) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [streams] What types does ReadableByteStream's reader's read(x) accept and return? (#295) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [streams] What types does ReadableByteStream's reader's read(x) accept and return? (#295) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Tuesday, 10 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Tuesday, 10 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Monday, 9 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Sunday, 8 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [streams] Change the model for ReadableStream to have async read() (#288) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [streams] Change the model for ReadableStream to have async read() (#288) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [streams] Change the model for ReadableStream to have async read() (#288) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [streams] Prototyping several changes for better support for reading bytes (#287) (Wednesday, 4 March)
Re: [streams] Prototyping several changes for better support for reading bytes (#287) (Wednesday, 4 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Wednesday, 4 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Wednesday, 4 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Wednesday, 4 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Wednesday, 4 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Wednesday, 4 March)
Re: [streams] Prototyping several changes for better support for reading bytes (#287) (Wednesday, 4 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Wednesday, 4 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Wednesday, 4 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Tuesday, 3 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Tuesday, 3 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Tuesday, 3 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Tuesday, 3 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Tuesday, 3 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Tuesday, 3 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Tuesday, 3 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Tuesday, 3 March)
Re: [streams] New proposal for byte stream uses cases (#289) (Tuesday, 3 March)
Re: [streams] How will ReadableByteStream work with seekable resources? (#253) (Tuesday, 3 March)
Re: [streams] How will ReadableByteStream work with seekable resources? (#253) (Tuesday, 3 March)
Re: [streams] Change the model for ReadableStream to have async read() (#288) (Tuesday, 3 March)
Re: [streams] Operation stream (#287) (Monday, 2 March)
Re: [streams] Operation stream (#287) (Monday, 2 March)
Re: [streams] Operation stream (#287) (Monday, 2 March)
Re: [streams] New proposal for byte stream uses cases (#289) (Monday, 2 March)
Re: [streams] Operation stream (#287) (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: [streams] Operation stream (#287) (Sunday, 1 March)
Re: [streams] Operation stream (#287) (Sunday, 1 March)

Tobias Buschor

Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Monday, 9 March)
Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Monday, 9 March)

Tomás Aparicio

Re: [ServiceWorker] importScripts() should throw? (#642) (Monday, 2 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] importScripts() should throw? (#642) (Sunday, 1 March)

Trevor Norris

[streams] Implementation of net.Socket (#305) (Monday, 23 March)
Re: [streams] Performance Check vs. Node Streams (#304) (Friday, 20 March)

Viktor

Re: [selection-api] Selection.toString is under specified (#7) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [selection-api] Selection.toString is under specified (#7) (Tuesday, 17 March)
Re: [selection-api] Selection.toString is under specified (#7) (Monday, 16 March)

Volker E.

Re: [manifest] A means to control the "theme color" (#225) (Saturday, 7 March)

Walle Cyril

[manifest] difference between lang and default_locale (#345) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [manifest] typo found (#342) (Wednesday, 25 March)
[manifest] typo found (#342) (Tuesday, 24 March)

wintersommer

Re: [ServiceWorker] service-worker.d.ts.... (#576) (Thursday, 26 March)

Xabier Rodríguez

Yan Zhu

Re: [spec-reviews] permissions API (#45) (Thursday, 5 March)
[spec-reviews] permissions API (#45) (Thursday, 5 March)

Yavuz Ege Özcan

Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 26 March)

youennf

Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308) (Monday, 30 March)
[streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308) (Monday, 30 March)
Re: [streams] Do we need to pass enqueue and close as parameters to UnderlyingSource.pull? (#292) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [streams] Why is the reference implementation calling promise callbacks synchronously? (#293) (Wednesday, 11 March)
Re: [streams] Do we need to pass enqueue and close as parameters to UnderlyingSource.pull? (#292) (Wednesday, 11 March)
[streams] Why is the reference implementation calling promise callbacks synchronously? (#293) (Wednesday, 11 March)
[streams] Do we need to pass enqueue and close as parameters to UnderlyingSource.pull? (#292) (Wednesday, 11 March)

Yutaka Hirano

Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Saturday, 28 March)
Re: [streams] can streams be transferred via postMessage()? (#276) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [streams] can streams be transferred via postMessage()? (#276) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452) (Thursday, 26 March)
Re: [streams] Byte streams tracking bug (#300) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [streams] Defined behavior of each method on ByobByteStreamReader without detailed algorithm (5056a21) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [streams] Defined behavior of each method on ByobByteStreamReader without detailed algorithm (5056a21) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [streams] Defined behavior of each method on ByobByteStreamReader without detailed algorithm (5056a21) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [streams] Defined behavior of each method on ByobByteStreamReader without detailed algorithm (5056a21) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [streams] Defined behavior of each method on ByobByteStreamReader without detailed algorithm (5056a21) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [streams] Defined behavior of each method on ByobByteStreamReader without detailed algorithm (5056a21) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [streams] Defined behavior of each method on ByobByteStreamReader without detailed algorithm (5056a21) (Wednesday, 25 March)
Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302) (Friday, 20 March)
Re: [streams] What types does ReadableByteStream's reader's read(x) accept and return? (#295) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302) (Thursday, 19 March)
Re: [streams] Getting errored/closed reader, Auto-releasing reader, Forcible cancel() on a stream (#297) (Monday, 16 March)
Re: [streams] getting and releasing reader (#297) (Friday, 13 March)
[streams] getting and releasing reader (#297) (Friday, 13 March)
Re: [streams] What should we call ReadableByteStream.prototype.getBYOBReader()? (#294) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [streams] What should we call ReadableByteStream.prototype.getBYOBReader()? (#294) (Thursday, 12 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Tuesday, 10 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Friday, 6 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Thursday, 5 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Wednesday, 4 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Wednesday, 4 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Wednesday, 4 March)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Tuesday, 3 March)

Yves Lafon

Re: [push-api] Delete the 'master' branch please (#127) (Wednesday, 18 March)
Re: [push-api] Delete the 'master' branch please (#127) (Wednesday, 18 March)

zenparsing

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 March 2015 23:37:29 UTC