- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 21:13:28 -0700
- To: whatwg/streams <streams@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 16 March 2015 04:13:54 UTC
Oh wow, good point, I hadn't thought of that. That would make more sense. Maybe we should leave pipes uncancellable until cancellable promises land. That would give me more motivation to work on cancellable promises, haha -_-. The latter is pretty similar to revealing constructor, yeah. Although it would tie into a more general cancelable promise framework. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/297#issuecomment-81399366
Received on Monday, 16 March 2015 04:13:54 UTC