Re: [spec-reviews] permissions API (#45)

Agree the promises API is nice.

I'm worried it doesn't include the ability to request permissions, has some funky API style (non-constructable types, etc.), and  I share the concerns about the registry. In particular, why are many of the existing web permissions missing? How will this get evolved over time, given that we don't want WGs to stay open past their sell-by date?

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/spec-reviews/issues/45#issuecomment-77473989