- From: Takeshi Yoshino <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 21:25:35 -0800
- To: whatwg/streams <streams@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 3 March 2015 05:26:04 UTC
I now think "correspondence between pull() and read()" is less important compared to the other perspectives. I'm leaning toward making `getReader()` only succeeds when there's no pending `read()`. Maybe I'd represent that (lockable or not) using some attribute on the stream. After thinking carefully, I don't think there's any big benefit to allow acquisition of lock while there's pending `read()`. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/253#issuecomment-76889254
Received on Tuesday, 3 March 2015 05:26:04 UTC