- From: Matt Falkenhagen <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 23:59:09 -0700
- To: slightlyoff/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 31 March 2015 07:02:08 UTC
Sorry, please disregard the second part of my last comment. However, there is a related spec bug: Activate's step 10: "For each service worker client client whose active worker is not null..." seems wrong. It should say "for clients already associated with the registration..." Reading that is what caused me to think the controllerchange naming is wrong. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/659#issuecomment-87967817
Received on Tuesday, 31 March 2015 07:02:08 UTC