- From: Arthur Stolyar <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 13:02:41 -0700
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 31 March 2015 20:03:02 UTC
@WebReflection
I believe you do not hear me. I am not talking what there should be magic which cancels all potential async operations inside executor. This is approximately how it should be implemented for subclass:
```javascript
class AjaxPromise extends Promise {
constructor(...) {
var xhr = new XMLHttpRequest();
// ...
this[Symbol.lock] = () => {
xhr.abort();
}
}
}
var ajax = function(config) {
return new AjaxPromise(config);
};
```
> That plus the implicit exit behavior that does not fit with anything Promises, async, or await, related.
That is exactly what promises missing. So ```exit``` behavior does not fit, but ```cancellation``` behavior fits? I really do not see here much differences between these two concepts. ```async```/```await``` will form fine too.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/27#issuecomment-88228435
Received on Tuesday, 31 March 2015 20:03:02 UTC