- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 13:10:09 -0800
- To: whatwg/streams <streams@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 2 March 2015 21:10:39 UTC
@tyoshino I am now convinced your idea is 100% necessary since the example `socket_chunkwise` is very buggy as-is. The buffer that we mean to be re-using will be shrinking all the time, which sucks. I will update the gist with your idea instead. Also I had another idea which is to combine wait() and read() into a single async read with an optional argument. It seems OK but not great. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/289#issuecomment-76823460
Received on Monday, 2 March 2015 21:10:39 UTC