Re: [spec-reviews] http-problem (#37)

I'm very sorry for not getting this done in a more timely way. Sincerest apologies to the IETF WG in question.

In no particular order:

 - *Reserving an extension syntax is a good idea*: Having something like "-" to delimit extensions from built-in items, or defining your extension object (where anything goes) is a good idea early on. Don't really have a preference, but "-" in the name seems fine.
 - *`"instance"` is odd*: it doesn't define a schema for the problem definition or the information to be de-ref'd. Is this common enough to need to be part of a spec? Is their prior art justifying it?
 - *How is the pre-defined problem-type registry going to be maintained?*: It isn't clear how additions will get made. Who "owns" it?

In general, I think this is great. Love that it's happening. Is there someplace I can look to understand the discussion that led to each of the fields?


---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/spec-reviews/issues/37#issuecomment-85229894